324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11168273)
21. Accuracy of treatment planning based on stereolithography in computer assisted surgery.
Schicho K; Figl M; Seemann R; Ewers R; Lambrecht JT; Wagner A; Watzinger F; Baumann A; Kainberger F; Fruehwald J; Klug C
Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3408-17. PubMed ID: 17022237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Positioning of dental implants using computer-aided navigation and an optical tracking system: case report and presentation of a new method.
Watzinger F; Birkfellner W; Wanschitz F; Millesi W; Schopper C; Sinko K; Huber K; Bergmann H; Ewers R
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1999 Apr; 27(2):77-81. PubMed ID: 10342142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Effects of Distribution of Image Matched Fiducial Markers on Accuracy of Computer-Guided Implant Surgery.
Choi YD; Mai HN; Mai HY; Ha JH; Li LJ; Lee DH
J Prosthodont; 2020 Jun; 29(5):409-414. PubMed ID: 32237001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of an image-guided navigation system in dental implant surgery in anatomically complex operation sites.
Siessegger M; Schneider BT; Mischkowski RA; Lazar F; Krug B; Klesper B; Zöller JE
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Oct; 29(5):276-81. PubMed ID: 11673922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Registration of CT to 3D ultrasound using near-field fiducial localization: A feasibility study.
Kingma R; Rohling RN; Nguan C
Comput Aided Surg; 2011; 16(2):54-70. PubMed ID: 21322745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of CAD/CAM-guided surgical template implant surgery on human cadavers: Part I.
Pettersson A; Kero T; Gillot L; Cannas B; Fäldt J; Söderberg R; Näsström K
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jun; 103(6):334-42. PubMed ID: 20493322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of the accuracy of invasive and noninvasive registration methods for image-guided oral implant surgery.
Widmann G; Stoffner R; Schullian P; Widmann R; Keiler M; Zangerl A; Puelacher W; Bale RJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 20556247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Precision of transfer of preoperative planning for oral implants based on cone-beam CT-scan images through a robotic drilling machine.
Fortin T; Champleboux G; Bianchi S; Buatois H; Coudert JL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2002 Dec; 13(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 12519341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Application accuracy in frameless image-guided neurosurgery: a comparison study of three patient-to-image registration methods.
Woerdeman PA; Willems PW; Noordmans HJ; Tulleken CA; van der Sprenkel JW
J Neurosurg; 2007 Jun; 106(6):1012-6. PubMed ID: 17564173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
Al-Harbi SA; Sun AY
Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Accuracy of Intraoral Registration for Dynamic Surgical Navigation in the Edentulous Maxilla.
Al-Jarsha MY; Almezyad O; AlOtaibi N; Naudi KB; Robertson DP; Ayoub AF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 Jun; (3):21-46. PubMed ID: 38350113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Estimating FLEimage distributions of manual fiducial localization in CT images.
Bardosi Z; Freysinger W
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Jun; 11(6):1043-9. PubMed ID: 27025605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Virtually planned and template-guided implant surgery: an experimental model matching approach.
Komiyama A; Pettersson A; Hultin M; Näsström K; Klinge B
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Mar; 22(3):308-13. PubMed ID: 20868453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems.
Ruppin J; Popovic A; Strauss M; Spüntrup E; Steiner A; Stoll C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jul; 19(7):709-16. PubMed ID: 18492085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. An advanced navigational surgery system for dental implants completed in a single visit: an in vitro study.
Kim SG; Lee WJ; Lee SS; Heo MS; Huh KH; Choi SC; Kim TI; Yi WJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 43(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 25434287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.
Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A new markerless patient-to-image registration method using a portable 3D scanner.
Fan Y; Jiang D; Wang M; Song Z
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101910. PubMed ID: 25281962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Contribution of low-dose CT-scan protocols to the total positioning error in computer-assisted surgery.
Husstedt H; Heermann R; Becker H
Comput Aided Surg; 1999; 4(5):275-80. PubMed ID: 10581525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Improvement of registration accuracy in accelerated partial breast irradiation using the point-based rigid-body registration algorithm for patients with implanted fiducial markers.
Inoue M; Yoshimura M; Sato S; Nakamura M; Yamada M; Hirata K; Sasaki M; Fujimoto T; Ogura M; Hiraoka M
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1904-10. PubMed ID: 25832080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Anatomical landmarks for point-matching registration in image-guided neurosurgery.
Omara AI; Wang M; Fan Y; Song Z
Int J Med Robot; 2014 Mar; 10(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 23733606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
