147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11169600)
1. Statistical inferences for a twin correlation with multinomial outcomes.
Bartfay E; Donner A
Stat Med; 2001 Jan; 20(2):249-62. PubMed ID: 11169600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Testing the equality of twin correlations with multinomial outcomes.
Bartfay E; Donner A; Klar N
Ann Hum Genet; 1999 Jul; 63(Pt 4):341-9. PubMed ID: 10738545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bivariate models for co-aggregation of dichotomous traits in twins.
Shoukri MM; Donner A
Stat Med; 2007 Jan; 26(2):336-51. PubMed ID: 16538705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of methods for analyzing binary data arising from two-sample twin studies.
Gao XJ; Klar N; Donner A
Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(4):349-63. PubMed ID: 9271709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Twin concordances test for ascertained trichotomous traits data.
Huang JK; Tai JJ
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):869-94. PubMed ID: 16685706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Adjusted inference procedures for the interobserver agreement in twin studies.
Dixon SN; Donner A; Shoukri MM
Stat Methods Med Res; 2016 Aug; 25(4):1260-71. PubMed ID: 23487017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Heritability estimates from human twin data by incorporating historical prior information.
Chen MH; Manatunga AK; Williams CJ
Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1348-62. PubMed ID: 9883538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. University of Washington Twin Registry: construction and characteristics of a community-based twin registry.
Afari N; Noonan C; Goldberg J; Edwards K; Gadepalli K; Osterman B; Evanoff C; Buchwald D
Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Dec; 9(6):1023-9. PubMed ID: 17254446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Likelihood-based concordance tests for analysis of ascertained twin pair multinomial data.
Huang JK; Liu AY; Tai JJ
Stat Med; 2012 Jan; 31(1):69-79. PubMed ID: 22052434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A goodness-of-fit approach to inference procedures for the kappa statistic: confidence interval construction, significance-testing and sample size estimation.
Donner A; Eliasziw M
Stat Med; 1992 Aug; 11(11):1511-9. PubMed ID: 1410963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Precision and bias of a normal finite mixture distribution model to analyze twin data when zygosity is unknown: simulations and application to IQ phenotypes on a large sample of twin pairs.
Benyamin B; Deary IJ; Visscher PM
Behav Genet; 2006 Nov; 36(6):935-46. PubMed ID: 16786426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Healthy Twin: a twin-family study of Korea--protocols and current status.
Sung J; Cho SI; Lee K; Ha M; Choi EY; Choi JS; Kim H; Kim J; Hong KS; Kim Y; Yoo KY; Park C; Song YM
Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Dec; 9(6):844-8. PubMed ID: 17254419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Association within twin pairs for a dichotomous trait.
Olson JM; Witte JS; Elston RC
Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(5):489-99. PubMed ID: 8905395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using bivariate models to understand between- and within-cluster regression coefficients, with application to twin data.
Gurrin LC; Carlin JB; Sterne JA; Dite GS; Hopper JL
Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):745-51. PubMed ID: 16984316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PennTwins: a population-based cohort for twin studies.
Coccaro EF; Jacobson KC
Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Dec; 9(6):998-1005. PubMed ID: 17254443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fitting genetic models using Markov Chain Monte Carlo algorithms with BUGS.
van den Berg SM; Beem L; Boomsma DI
Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Jun; 9(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 16790144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sources of bias in heritability studies.
Harris EF; Potter RH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Sep; 112(3):17A-21A. PubMed ID: 9294348
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Discrete distributions for use in twin studies.
Yu C; Waller LA; Zelterman D
Biometrics; 1998 Jun; 54(2):546-57. PubMed ID: 9629643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of zygosity and chorion type on fat distribution in young adult twins consequences for twin studies.
Loos RJ; Beunen G; Fagard R; Derom C; Vlietinck R
Twin Res; 2001 Oct; 4(5):356-64. PubMed ID: 11869489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The equal environments assumption of classical twin studies may not hold.
Richardson K; Norgate S
Br J Educ Psychol; 2005 Sep; 75(Pt 3):339-50. PubMed ID: 16238870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
