These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11170117)

  • 1. A richer conceptualization of "exposure" for epidemiological studies of the "EMF mixture".
    Neutra RR; Del Pizzo V
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2001; Suppl 5():S48-57. PubMed ID: 11170117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating alternative exposure indices in epidemiologic studies on extremely low-frequency magnetic fields.
    Juutilainen J; Hatfield T; Läärä E
    Bioelectromagnetics; 1996; 17(2):138-43. PubMed ID: 8860731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electromagnetic fields (EMF): do they play a role in children's environmental health (CEH)?
    Otto M; von Mühlendahl KE
    Int J Hyg Environ Health; 2007 Oct; 210(5):635-44. PubMed ID: 17765660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analyses of magnetic-field peak-exposure summary measures.
    Mezei G; Bracken TD; Senior R; Kavet R
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2006 Nov; 16(6):477-85. PubMed ID: 16249799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of exposure metrics in an epidemiologic study on radio and television broadcast transmitters and the risk of childhood leukemia.
    Schmiedel S; Brüggemeyer H; Philipp J; Wendler J; Merzenich H; Schüz J
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Feb; 30(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 19025781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exposure to electromagnetic fields during pregnancy.
    Koren G
    Can Fam Physician; 2003 Feb; 49():151, 153. PubMed ID: 12619736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Electromagnetic poles and reproduction].
    Indulski JA; Makowiec-Dabrowska T; Zmyślony M; Siedlecka J
    Med Pr; 1997; 48(5):585-603. PubMed ID: 9501341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Developing policy in the face of scientific uncertainty: interpreting 0.3 microT or 0.4 microT cutpoints from EMF epidemiologic studies.
    Kheifets L; Sahl JD; Shimkhada R; Repacholi MH
    Risk Anal; 2005 Aug; 25(4):927-35. PubMed ID: 16268940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-cancer EMF effects related to children.
    Feychting M
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2005; Suppl 7():S69-74. PubMed ID: 16142774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. "Dirty electricity": what, where, and should we care?
    de Vocht F
    J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 20(5):399-405. PubMed ID: 20336048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wire coding in the EMF and Breast Cancer on Long Island Study: relationship to magnetic fields.
    O'Leary ES; Schoenfeld ER; Henderson K; Grimson R; Kabat GC; Kaune WT; Gammon MD; Leske MC;
    J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 13(4):283-93. PubMed ID: 12923555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comment on "Developing policy in the face of scientific uncertainty: interpreting 0.3 microT or 0.4 microT cutpoints from EMF epidemiologic studies" by Kheifets et al. in Risk Analysis, 25(4), 927-935.
    O'Carroll MJ; Henshaw DL
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):285-7; author reply 289-90. PubMed ID: 17511696
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comment on "developing policy in the face of scientific uncertainty: interpreting 0.3 microT or 0.4 microT cutpoints from EMF epidemiologic studies" by Kheifets et al. in Risk Analysis, 25(4), 927-935.
    Kundi M
    Risk Anal; 2006 Jun; 26(3):579-81; author reply 583-4. PubMed ID: 16834616
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Future needs of occupational epidemiology of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: review and recommendations.
    Kheifets L; Bowman JD; Checkoway H; Feychting M; Harrington JM; Kavet R; Marsh G; Mezei G; Renew DC; van Wijngaarden E
    Occup Environ Med; 2009 Feb; 66(2):72-80. PubMed ID: 18805878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Hygienic assessment of sources of electromagnetic fields using revised and new standards of maximum admissible intensities].
    Aniołczyk H; Mamrot P; Politański P
    Med Pr; 2004; 55(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 15156768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association between occupational exposure to power frequency electromagnetic fields and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a review.
    Li CY; Sung FC
    Am J Ind Med; 2003 Feb; 43(2):212-20. PubMed ID: 12541277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards.
    Hardell L; Sage C
    Biomed Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 62(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 18242044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electromagnetic fields and epidemiology: an overview inspired by the fourth course at the International School of Bioelectromagnetics.
    Schüz J; Lagorio S; Bersani F
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2009 Oct; 30(7):511-24. PubMed ID: 19479936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) and subjective health complaints associated with electromagnetic fields of mobile phone communication--a literature review published between 2000 and 2004.
    Seitz H; Stinner D; Eikmann T; Herr C; Röösli M
    Sci Total Environ; 2005 Oct; 349(1-3):45-55. PubMed ID: 15975631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Occupational exposure to electromagnetic fields and its health effects in electric energy workers].
    Szadkowska-Stańczyk I; Zmyślony M
    Med Pr; 2000; 51(6):637-52. PubMed ID: 11288692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.