BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11172123)

  • 21. Randomized comparison of Burch urethropexy procedures concomitant with gynecologic operations.
    Ustün Y; Engin-Ustün Y; Güngör M; Tezcan S
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 59(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 15627777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Burch colposuspension.
    Veit-Rubin N; Dubuisson J; Ford A; Dubuisson JB; Mourad S; Digesu A
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2019 Feb; 38(2):553-562. PubMed ID: 30620096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for recurrent stress urinary incontinence.
    Moore RD; Speights SE; Miklos JR
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2001 Aug; 8(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 11509779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for stress incontinence: preliminary results.
    Lam AM; Jenkins GJ; Hyslop RS
    Med J Aust; 1995 Jan; 162(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 7845292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A randomised trial comparing open Burch colposuspension using sutures with laparoscopic colposuspension using mesh and staples in women with stress urinary incontinence.
    Ankardal M; Ekerydh A; Crafoord K; Milsom I; Stjerndahl JH; Engh ME
    BJOG; 2004 Sep; 111(9):974-81. PubMed ID: 15327613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dynamic morphological changes in the anterior vaginal wall before and after laparoscopic Burch colposuspension in primary urodynamic stress incontinence.
    Yang JM; Yang SH; Huang WC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 25(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 15736202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of laparoscopic and open retropubic urethropexy for treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
    Polascik TJ; Moore RG; Rosenberg MT; Kavoussi LR
    Urology; 1995 Apr; 45(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 7716846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Laparoscopic Burch surgery: is there any advantage in relation to open approach?
    Bezerra CA; Rodrigues AO; Seo AL; Ruano JM; Borrelli M; Wroclawski ER
    Int Braz J Urol; 2004; 30(3):230-6. PubMed ID: 15689257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Feasibility of and interest in laparoscopic assessment in recurrent urinary stress incontinence after Burch procedure performed by laparotomy.
    von Theobald P; Barjot P; Lévy G
    Surg Endosc; 1997 May; 11(5):468-71. PubMed ID: 9153177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Laparoscopic colposuspension for urinary incontinence in women.
    Moehrer B; Ellis G; Carey M; Wilson PD
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2002; (1):CD002239. PubMed ID: 11869634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prospective comparison of laparoscopic and traditional colposuspensions in the treatment of genuine stress incontinence.
    Su TH; Wang KG; Hsu CY; Wei HJ; Hong BK
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1997 Jul; 76(6):576-82. PubMed ID: 9246967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Small bowel obstruction in a peritoneal defect after laparoscopic Burch procedure.
    Margossian H; Pollard RR; Walters MD
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1999 Aug; 6(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 10459040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Five years follow up of laparoscopic burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in Thai women.
    Bunyavejchevin S; Wisawasukmongchol W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Sep; 88(9):1182-6. PubMed ID: 16536102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The contemporary role of Burch colposuspension.
    Green J; Herschorn S
    Curr Opin Urol; 2005 Jul; 15(4):250-5. PubMed ID: 15928514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multichannel urodynamic evaluation of laparoscopic Burch colposuspension for genuine stress incontinence.
    Ross JW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jan; 91(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 9464721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The efficacy of laparoscopic mesh colposuspension: results of a prospective controlled study.
    el-Toukhy TA; Davies AE
    BJU Int; 2001 Sep; 88(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 11564022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Optimization of endosurgical treatment of women with stress urine incontinence].
    Podoluzhnyĭ VI; Rybnikov SV; Artamonov VA; Chunarev VF
    Urologiia; 2004; (6):40-4. PubMed ID: 15719730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Normal preoperative urodynamic testing does not predict voiding dysfunction after Burch colposuspension versus pubovaginal sling.
    Lemack GE; Krauss S; Litman H; FitzGerald MP; Chai T; Nager C; Sirls L; Zyczynski H; Baker J; Lloyd K; Steers WD;
    J Urol; 2008 Nov; 180(5):2076-80. PubMed ID: 18804239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Laparoscopic paravaginal repair plus burch colposuspension: review and descriptive technique.
    Miklos JR; Kohli N
    Urology; 2000 Dec; 56(6 Suppl 1):64-9. PubMed ID: 11114565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cost comparison of the laparoscopic burch colposuspension, laparoscopic two-team sling procedure, and the transobturator tape procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.
    Lo K; Marcoux V; Grossman S; Kung R; Lee P
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Mar; 35(3):252-257. PubMed ID: 23470113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.