1725 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11172316)
1. Changing concepts in long-term central venous access: catheter selection and cost savings.
Horattas MC; Trupiano J; Hopkins S; Pasini D; Martino C; Murty A
Am J Infect Control; 2001 Feb; 29(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 11172316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complications and cost associated with parenteral nutrition delivered to hospitalized patients through either subclavian or peripherally-inserted central catheters.
Cowl CT; Weinstock JV; Al-Jurf A; Ephgrave K; Murray JA; Dillon K
Clin Nutr; 2000 Aug; 19(4):237-43. PubMed ID: 10952794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interventional radiology in the provision and maintenance of long-term central venous access.
Lyon SM; Given M; Marshall NL
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2008 Feb; 52(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 18373820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: central venous catheters (access, care, diagnosis and therapy of complications).
Pittiruti M; Hamilton H; Biffi R; MacFie J; Pertkiewicz M;
Clin Nutr; 2009 Aug; 28(4):365-77. PubMed ID: 19464090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of delayed complications of central venous catheters placed surgically or radiologically in pediatric oncology patients.
Basford TJ; Poenaru D; Silva M
J Pediatr Surg; 2003 May; 38(5):788-92. PubMed ID: 12720195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Insertion and management of long-term central venous devices: role of radiologic imaging techniques].
Capaccioli L; Nistri M; Distante V; Rontini M; Manetti A; Stecco A
Radiol Med; 1998 Oct; 96(4):369-74. PubMed ID: 9972217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Economic evaluation of peripherally inserted central catheter and other venous access devices: A scoping review.
Wang K; Zhong J; Huang N; Zhou Y
J Vasc Access; 2020 Nov; 21(6):826-837. PubMed ID: 31894710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experience using peripherally inserted central venous catheters for outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in children at a community hospital.
Van Winkle P; Whiffen T; Liu IL
Pediatr Infect Dis J; 2008 Dec; 27(12):1069-72. PubMed ID: 18946365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of surgical and radiologic placed implantable central venous access ports.
Sticca RP; Dewing BD; Harris JD
Am J Surg; 2009 Dec; 198(6):829-33. PubMed ID: 19969137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of totally implanted reservoirs with external catheters as venous access devices in pediatric oncologic patients.
Ross MN; Haase GM; Poole MA; Burrington JD; Odom LF
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Aug; 167(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 3400032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Blind" placement of long-term central venous access devices: report of 589 consecutive procedures.
Kincaid EH; Davis PW; Chang MC; Fenstermaker JM; Pennell TC
Am Surg; 1999 Jun; 65(6):520-3; discussion 523-4. PubMed ID: 10366205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Use of peripherally inserted multilumen catheters as an alternative to central venous access].
Pardo De La Vega R; Los Arcos Solas M; Ferrero De La Mano L; Medina Villanueva A; Concha Torre A; Rey Galán C
An Esp Pediatr; 2002 Jul; 57(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 12139888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost comparison of radiologic versus surgical placement of long-term hemodialysis catheters.
Noh HM; Kaufman JA; Rhea JT; Kim SY; Geller SC; Waltman AC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):673-5. PubMed ID: 10063858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost analysis of Hickman catheter insertion at bedside in gynecologic oncology patients.
Mannel RS; Manetta A; Hickman RL; Walker JL; Berman ML; DiSaia PJ
J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Nov; 179(5):558-60. PubMed ID: 7952458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low infection rate and long durability of nontunneled silastic catheters. A safe and cost-effective alternative for long-term venous access.
Raad I; Davis S; Becker M; Hohn D; Houston D; Umphrey J; Bodey GP
Arch Intern Med; 1993 Aug; 153(15):1791-6. PubMed ID: 8392831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Peripherally inserted central catheters in the patient with cardiomyopathy. The most cost-effective venous acess.
Major BM; Crow MM
J Intraven Nurs; 2000; 23(6):366-70. PubMed ID: 11847708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Central venous catheters for infusion therapy in gastrointestinal cancer. A comparative study of tunnelled centrally placed catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters.
Snelling R; Jones G; Figueredo A; Major P
J Intraven Nurs; 2001; 24(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 11836843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Peripherally inserted central catheters in an acute-care hospital.
Lam S; Scannell R; Roessler D; Smith MA
Arch Intern Med; 1994 Aug; 154(16):1833-7. PubMed ID: 8053751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
Nosher JL; Bodner LJ; Ettinger LJ; Siegel RL; Gribbin C; Asch J; Drachtman RA
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Review of peripherally inserted central catheters in the Singapore acute-care hospital.
Chlebicki MP; Teo EK
Singapore Med J; 2003 Oct; 44(10):531-5. PubMed ID: 15024458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
