BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11172707)

  • 41. Chromatin assembly factors Asf1 and CAF-1 have overlapping roles in deactivating the DNA damage checkpoint when DNA repair is complete.
    Kim JA; Haber JE
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2009 Jan; 106(4):1151-6. PubMed ID: 19164567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Role of the N-terminal forkhead-associated domain in the cell cycle checkpoint function of the Rad53 kinase.
    Pike BL; Hammet A; Heierhorst J
    J Biol Chem; 2001 Apr; 276(17):14019-26. PubMed ID: 11278522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Hsp90 induces increased genomic instability toward DNA-damaging agents by tuning down RAD53 transcription.
    Khurana N; Laskar S; Bhattacharyya MK; Bhattacharyya S
    Mol Biol Cell; 2016 Aug; 27(15):2463-78. PubMed ID: 27307581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. RAD53, DUN1 and PDS1 define two parallel G2/M checkpoint pathways in budding yeast.
    Gardner R; Putnam CW; Weinert T
    EMBO J; 1999 Jun; 18(11):3173-85. PubMed ID: 10357828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Checkpoint deficient rad53-11 yeast cannot accumulate dNTPs in response to DNA damage.
    Koc A; Merrill GF
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2007 Feb; 353(2):527-30. PubMed ID: 17188244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Yeast G1 DNA damage checkpoint regulation by H2A phosphorylation is independent of chromatin remodeling.
    Javaheri A; Wysocki R; Jobin-Robitaille O; Altaf M; Côté J; Kron SJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2006 Sep; 103(37):13771-6. PubMed ID: 16940359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Docking onto chromatin via the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 Tudor domain.
    Grenon M; Costelloe T; Jimeno S; O'Shaughnessy A; Fitzgerald J; Zgheib O; Degerth L; Lowndes NF
    Yeast; 2007 Feb; 24(2):105-19. PubMed ID: 17243194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Prevention of DNA Rereplication Through a Meiotic Recombination Checkpoint Response.
    Najor NA; Weatherford L; Brush GS
    G3 (Bethesda); 2016 Dec; 6(12):3869-3881. PubMed ID: 27678521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Interplay between histone H3 lysine 56 deacetylation and chromatin modifiers in response to DNA damage.
    Simoneau A; Delgoshaie N; Celic I; Dai J; Abshiru N; Costantino S; Thibault P; Boeke JD; Verreault A; Wurtele H
    Genetics; 2015 May; 200(1):185-205. PubMed ID: 25786853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad9 acts as a Mec1 adaptor to allow Rad53 activation.
    Sweeney FD; Yang F; Chi A; Shabanowitz J; Hunt DF; Durocher D
    Curr Biol; 2005 Aug; 15(15):1364-75. PubMed ID: 16085488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases.
    Smolka MB; Albuquerque CP; Chen SH; Zhou H
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Jun; 104(25):10364-9. PubMed ID: 17563356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The Yeast DNA Damage Checkpoint Kinase Rad53 Targets the Exoribonuclease, Xrn1.
    Lao JP; Ulrich KM; Johnson JR; Newton BW; Vashisht AA; Wohlschlegel JA; Krogan NJ; Toczyski DP
    G3 (Bethesda); 2018 Dec; 8(12):3931-3944. PubMed ID: 30377154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Distinct roles of yeast MEC and RAD checkpoint genes in transcriptional induction after DNA damage and implications for function.
    Kiser GL; Weinert TA
    Mol Biol Cell; 1996 May; 7(5):703-18. PubMed ID: 8744945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Remodelling the Rad9 checkpoint complex: preparing Rad53 for action.
    van den Bosch M; Lowndes NF
    Cell Cycle; 2004 Feb; 3(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 14712069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Srs2 DNA helicase is involved in checkpoint response and its regulation requires a functional Mec1-dependent pathway and Cdk1 activity.
    Liberi G; Chiolo I; Pellicioli A; Lopes M; Plevani P; Muzi-Falconi M; Foiani M
    EMBO J; 2000 Sep; 19(18):5027-38. PubMed ID: 10990466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Role of Dot1-dependent histone H3 methylation in G1 and S phase DNA damage checkpoint functions of Rad9.
    Wysocki R; Javaheri A; Allard S; Sha F; Côté J; Kron SJ
    Mol Cell Biol; 2005 Oct; 25(19):8430-43. PubMed ID: 16166626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Dynamic changes in protein-protein interaction and protein phosphorylation probed with amine-reactive isotope tag.
    Smolka MB; Albuquerque CP; Chen SH; Schmidt KH; Wei XX; Kolodner RD; Zhou H
    Mol Cell Proteomics; 2005 Sep; 4(9):1358-69. PubMed ID: 15972895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Mechanisms of checkpoint kinase Rad53 inactivation after a double-strand break in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Guillemain G; Ma E; Mauger S; Miron S; Thai R; Guérois R; Ochsenbein F; Marsolier-Kergoat MC
    Mol Cell Biol; 2007 May; 27(9):3378-89. PubMed ID: 17325030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Regulation of DNA replication fork progression through damaged DNA by the Mec1/Rad53 checkpoint.
    Tercero JA; Diffley JF
    Nature; 2001 Aug; 412(6846):553-7. PubMed ID: 11484057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The silencing complex SAS-I links histone acetylation to the assembly of repressed chromatin by CAF-I and Asf1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
    Meijsing SH; Ehrenhofer-Murray AE
    Genes Dev; 2001 Dec; 15(23):3169-82. PubMed ID: 11731480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.