These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11174534)

  • 21. Effectiveness of twin blocks and extraoral maxillary splint (Thurow) appliances for the correction of Class II relationships.
    Fernandes ÁF; Brunharo IH; Quintão CC; Costa MG; de Oliveira-Costa MR
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 20877731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Soft tissue angle evaluation of fixed Twin-Block appliance treatment and tooth extraction treatment in skeletal Class II malocclusion].
    Gong Y; Li PL; Wang HH; Yu Q; Wei B; Shen G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2016 Feb; 25(1):82-6. PubMed ID: 27063315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures.
    Bilgiç F; Hamamci O; Başaran G
    Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 22372266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The twin block appliance.
    Rondeau B
    Funct Orthod; 1995; 12(2):6-14, 16-21. PubMed ID: 8613116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effects of Twin-Block and Faramand-LL appliances on soft tissue profile in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Yassaei S; Jamilian A; Joshan N
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(4):57-62. PubMed ID: 25745712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Analysis of the efficacy of Twin-block appliance on maxillofacial growth of six pairs of monozygotic twins].
    Ji GP; Pan XG; Shen G; Huang N
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Aug; 14(4):359-64. PubMed ID: 16155698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of a Clark twin block on mandibular motion: a case report.
    O'Shea C; Quick A; Johnson G; Carman A; Herbison P
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 21175031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A prospective cohort study of a clip-on fixed functional appliance.
    Read MJ; Deacon S; O'Brien K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Apr; 125(4):444-9. PubMed ID: 15067260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Update on the Bass appliance system.
    Bass NM
    J Clin Orthod; 1994 Jul; 28(7):421-8. PubMed ID: 8613522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The twin block appliance for the correction of Class II malocclusion.
    Gill D; Sharma A; Naini F; Jones S
    Dent Update; 2005 Apr; 32(3):158-60, 163-4, 167-8. PubMed ID: 15881511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. "Effective" TMJ and chin position changes in Class II treatment.
    Serbesis-Tsarudis C; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):813-8. PubMed ID: 18298212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A cephalometric analysis of six Twin Block patients. A study of mandibular (body and ramus) growth and development.
    Stangl DP
    Funct Orthod; 1997; 14(2):4-6, 8-14, 17-9 passim. PubMed ID: 9610277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cephalometric evaluation of the Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data.
    Trenouth MJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Jan; 117(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 10629520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Class II correction with the Twin Force Bite Corrector.
    Rothenberg J; Campbell ES; Nanda R
    J Clin Orthod; 2004 Apr; 38(4):232-40. PubMed ID: 15115897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
    Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of the Twin-block appliance treatment on the skeletal and dentolaveolar changes in Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Sidlauskas A
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2005; 41(5):392-400. PubMed ID: 15947523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A cephalometric comparison of treatment with the Twin-block and stainless steel crown Herbst appliances followed by fixed appliance therapy.
    Schaefer AT; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jul; 126(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 15224053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Banded block.
    Gerber JW
    Funct Orthod; 1999; 16(4):16-20. PubMed ID: 11314330
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of the Herbst appliance in growing orthodontic patients with different underlying vertical patterns.
    Deen E; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2015 May; 31(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 26219148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinical applications of the mandibular protraction appliance.
    Coelho Filho CM
    J Clin Orthod; 1997 Feb; 31(2):92-102. PubMed ID: 9511530
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.