These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11174534)

  • 41. The use of Twin Force functional fixed orthopedic appliance in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion.
    Yamazaki MS; Rosário HD; El-Haje O; Alvim-Pereira F; Paranhos LR
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2014; 25(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 24812744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical effectiveness of the Twin block appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Sidlauskas A
    Stomatologija; 2005; 7(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 16254470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial.
    O'Brien K; Wright J; Conboy F; Sanjie Y; Mandall N; Chadwick S; Connolly I; Cook P; Birnie D; Hammond M; Harradine N; Lewis D; McDade C; Mitchell L; Murray A; O'Neill J; Read M; Robinson S; Roberts-Harry D; Sandler J; Shaw I
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Aug; 124(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 12923506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Treatment effects of the twin block appliance: a cephalometric study.
    Mills CM; McCulloch KJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Jul; 114(1):15-24. PubMed ID: 9674675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Treatment of Class II Div I malocclusion with two phase therapy--a case report.
    Jyothikiran H; Shanthraj R; Kumar YP; Subbiah P
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2013; 24(2):45-8. PubMed ID: 23941030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance.
    Trivedi R; Bhattacharya A; Mehta F; Patel D; Parekh H; Gandhi V
    Prog Orthod; 2015 Feb; 16():3. PubMed ID: 25769138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Orthopedic treatment of dento-skeletal Class II by the association minivis + Forsus(TM): a clinical case].
    Pujol P
    Orthod Fr; 2014 Jun; 85(2):201-15. PubMed ID: 24923219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of 2 modifications of the twin-block appliance in matched Class II samples.
    Parkin NA; McKeown HF; Sandler PJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Jun; 119(6):572-7. PubMed ID: 11395699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The effect of Frankel II and modified twin block appliances on the 'C'-axis: the growth vector of the dentomaxillary complex.
    Braun S; Diers NR; Engel G; Wojtkiewicz P; Ewing SK
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):749-53. PubMed ID: 15673135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dentofacial changes after orthodontic intervention with eruption guidance appliance in the early mixed dentition.
    Keski-Nisula K; Keski-Nisula L; Salo H; Voipio K; Varrela J
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Mar; 78(2):324-31. PubMed ID: 18251597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Effect of Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II and division I malocclusion: a cephalometric study in 12 patients].
    Luo Y; Fang G
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Feb; 14(1):90-3. PubMed ID: 15747025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Correction of asymmetry with a mandibular propulsion appliance.
    Miguel JA; Zanardi G
    J Clin Orthod; 2008 Feb; 42(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 18477826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparison of Twin-block and Dynamax appliances for the treatment of Class II malocclusion in adolescents: a randomized controlled trial.
    Thiruvenkatachari B; Sandler J; Murray A; Walsh T; O'Brien K
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):144.e1-9; discussion 144-5. PubMed ID: 20691354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Simplicity in orthodontic treatment--part II.
    Cronin T
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2004; 15(2):41-3. PubMed ID: 15298132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Treatment of Angle Class II division I malocclusion cases with Twin-block appliance combined with face bow and intermaxillary elastic: report of 17 cases].
    Gong X; Qian YF
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Aug; 14(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 16155699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The flip-lock Herbst appliance.
    Miller RA
    J Clin Orthod; 1996 Oct; 30(10):552-8. PubMed ID: 10356473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Herbst Appliance fixed-functional appliance Class II skeletal malocclusion.
    Rondeau B
    J Gen Orthod; 2001; 12(3):7-17. PubMed ID: 11692451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Treatment of Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Forsus Fatigue Resistance Appliance and Its Re-activation by Using Custom-made Crimp.
    Aileni KR; Rachala MR; Dharmender SR; Rajesh V; Sandeep B
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2016; 27(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 27319039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [The potentiality of antero-posterior orthodontic extraoral traction: clinical and cephalometric results].
    Deblock L; Becker A
    Orthod Fr; 1992; 63 Pt 2():381-93. PubMed ID: 1341727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [An eight-factor analysis of early skeletal Class II malocclusion using Fränkel appliance].
    Lai W; Lu S; Huang N; Zhao M
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1999 Aug; 17(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 12539305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.