111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11174581)
1. Image-receptor performance: a comparison of Trophy RVG UI sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film.
Ludlow J; Mol A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 11174581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Characteristics of Kodak Insight, an F-speed intraoral film.
Ludlow JB; Platin E; Mol A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 11174582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. RVG-ui: a sensor to rival direct-exposure intra-oral x-ray film.
Farman AG; Farman TT
Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Jul; 2(3):183-96. PubMed ID: 11351483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of RVGui sensor and Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film for proximal caries detection.
Abreu M; Mol A; Ludlow JB
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):381-5. PubMed ID: 11250640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimated skin exposure as an indicator for comparing radiovisiography (RVG) versus conventional Ektaspeed Plus dental radiography.
Jones GA; Schuman NJ; Woods MA
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 9643185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Objective and subjective assessments of Kodak Ektaspeed plus new dental X-ray film: a comparison with other conventional X-ray films.
Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Wakoh M; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1995 May; 36(2):61-7. PubMed ID: 8689744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of the validation method on diagnostic accuracy for caries. A comparison of six digital and two conventional radiographic systems.
Hintze H; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Jan; 31(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 11803388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement algorithm accuracy of the RVG-PCi in vertical and diagonal assessments at various beam energies.
Garlock JA; Scarfe WC; Kamer KR; Farman AG
J Endod; 1996 Dec; 22(12):646-50. PubMed ID: 9220748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems.
Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K
Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of 18 different x-ray detectors currently used in dentistry.
Farman AG; Farman TT
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Apr; 99(4):485-9. PubMed ID: 15772598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [New film for intraoral radiography].
Verdonschot EH; Duijsings JH
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2001 Apr; 108(4):142-4. PubMed ID: 11383356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Physical properties and ease of operation of a wireless intraoral x-ray sensor.
Tsuchida R; Araki K; Endo A; Funahashi I; Okano T
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Nov; 100(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 16243247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Densitometric comparisons of Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus intraoral films for two processing conditions.
Ludlow JB; Platin E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1995 Jan; 79(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 7614148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of bit depth and kVp of digital radiography for detection of subtle differences.
Heo MS; Choi DH; Benavides E; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Aug; 108(2):278-83. PubMed ID: 19272812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of storage conditions on film characteristics of Ektaspeed plus and Ultra-speed films.
Platin E; Nesbit SP; Ludlow JB
J Am Dent Assoc; 1999 Feb; 130(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 10036844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of Kodak Ektaspeed Plus film and the Siemens Sidexis digital imaging system for caries detection using receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; Platin E; Nair M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Jan; 85(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 9474625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image quality of direct digital intraoral x-ray sensors in assessing root canal length. The RadioVisioGraphy, Visualix/VIXA, Sens-A-Ray, and Flash Dent systems compared with Ektaspeed films.
Sanderink GC; Huiskens R; van der Stelt PF; Welander US; Stheeman SE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1994 Jul; 78(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 8078654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An objective comparison of four digital intra-oral radiographic systems: sensitometric properties and resolution.
Araki K; Endo A; Okano T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Mar; 29(2):76-80. PubMed ID: 10808219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
