390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11174677)
1. Evaluation of a predictive model for implant surface topography effects on early osseointegration in the rat tibia model.
Abron A; Hopfensperger M; Thompson J; Cooper LF
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 11174677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cell and matrix reactions at titanium implants in surgically prepared rat tibiae.
Masuda T; Salvi GE; Offenbacher S; Felton DA; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(4):472-85. PubMed ID: 9274076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of H2O2/HCl heat treatment of implants on in vivo peri-implant bone formation.
Yang GL; He FM; Zhao SS; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1020-8. PubMed ID: 19216270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants.
Cooper LF; Zhou Y; Takebe J; Guo J; Abron A; Holmén A; Ellingsen JE
Biomaterials; 2006 Feb; 27(6):926-36. PubMed ID: 16112191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of bone around titanium implants and bioactive glass particles: an experimental study in rats.
Gorustovich A; Rosenbusch M; Guglielmotti MB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):644-50. PubMed ID: 12381064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Secondary stability assessment of titanium implants with an alkali-etched surface: a resonance frequency analysis study in beagle dogs.
Strnad J; Urban K; Povysil C; Strnad Z
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):502-12. PubMed ID: 18700375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A histomorphometric analysis of the effects of various surface treatment methods on osseointegration.
Kim YH; Koak JY; Chang IT; Wennerberg A; Heo SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 12814309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants.
Cooper LF
J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Nov; 84(5):522-34. PubMed ID: 11105008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bone response to a pure titanium implant surface modified by laser etching and microarc oxidation.
Guo Z; Zhou L; Rong M; Zhu A; Geng H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 20209195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits.
London RM; Roberts FA; Baker DA; Rohrer MD; O'Neal RB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of osteoblast spreading on microstructured dental implant surfaces and cell behaviour in an explant model of osseointegration. A scanning electron microscopic study.
Sammons RL; Lumbikanonda N; Gross M; Cantzler P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Dec; 16(6):657-66. PubMed ID: 16307572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of hydrofluoric acid treatment on titanium implant osseointegration in ovariectomized rats.
Li Y; Zou S; Wang D; Feng G; Bao C; Hu J
Biomaterials; 2010 Apr; 31(12):3266-73. PubMed ID: 20132983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Chronological changes in the ultrastructure of titanium-bone interfaces: analysis by light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and micro-computed tomography.
Morinaga K; Kido H; Sato A; Watazu A; Matsuura M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 11(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 18384402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Removal torque and histomorphometric investigation of 4 different titanium surfaces: an experimental study in the rabbit tibia.
Cordioli G; Majzoub Z; Piattelli A; Scarano A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(5):668-74. PubMed ID: 11055134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model.
Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interfacial shear strength of endosseous implants.
Butz F; Ogawa T; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):746-51. PubMed ID: 21841983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of ultraviolet photoactivation of titanium on osseointegration in a rat model.
Ueno T; Yamada M; Hori N; Suzuki T; Ogawa T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 20369086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nanostructured alumina-coated implant surface: effect on osteoblast-related gene expression and bone-to-implant contact in vivo.
Mendonça G; Mendonça DB; Simões LG; Araújo AL; Leite ER; Duarte WR; Cooper LF; Aragão FJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 19492635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
