390 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11174677)
41. Interface reaction at dental implants inserted in condensed bone.
Büchter A; Kleinheinz J; Wiesmann HP; Jayaranan M; Joos U; Meyer U
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2005 Oct; 16(5):509-17. PubMed ID: 16164455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone.
Sul YT; Johansson CB; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 12381062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Does titanium surface treatment influence the bone-implant interface? SEM and histomorphometry in a 6-month sheep study.
Huré G; Donath K; Lesourd M; Chappard D; Baslé MF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(4):506-11. PubMed ID: 8803346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model.
Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The effect of enzymatically degradable IPN coatings on peri-implant bone formation and implant fixation.
Ho JE; Barber TA; Virdi AS; Sumner DR; Healy KE
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2007 Jun; 81(3):720-7. PubMed ID: 17212345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Histomorphometric analysis of the bone-implant contact obtained with 4 different implant surface treatments placed side by side in the dog mandible.
Novaes AB; Souza SL; de Oliveira PT; Souza AM
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 12074453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study.
Shibli JA; Feres M; de Figueiredo LC; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 17351679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Healing response of cortical and cancellous bone around titanium implants.
Lee JE; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Han CH; Lee SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):655-62. PubMed ID: 19885405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Enhancement of bone-titanium integration profile with UV-photofunctionalized titanium in a gap healing model.
Ueno T; Yamada M; Suzuki T; Minamikawa H; Sato N; Hori N; Takeuchi K; Hattori M; Ogawa T
Biomaterials; 2010 Mar; 31(7):1546-57. PubMed ID: 19962757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Optimum surface properties of oxidized implants for reinforcement of osseointegration: surface chemistry, oxide thickness, porosity, roughness, and crystal structure.
Sul YT; Johansson C; Wennerberg A; Cho LR; Chang BS; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):349-59. PubMed ID: 15973946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Effects of bisphosphonate on bone reaction after placement of titanium implants in tibiae of ovariectomized rats.
Tokugawa Y; Shirota T; Ohno K; Yamaguchi A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 12608671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The correlation between gene expression of proinflammatory markers and bone formation during osseointegration with titanium implants.
Omar OM; Lennerås ME; Suska F; Emanuelsson L; Hall JM; Palmquist A; Thomsen P
Biomaterials; 2011 Jan; 32(2):374-86. PubMed ID: 20933278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Influence of age and gender on peri-implant osteogenesis. Age and gender on peri-implant osteogenesis.
Pien DM; Olmedo DG; Guglielmotti MB
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2001; 14(1-2):9-13. PubMed ID: 15208930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis.
Marco F; Milena F; Gianluca G; Vittoria O
Micron; 2005; 36(7-8):630-44. PubMed ID: 16182543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Biology of grit-blasted titanium alloy implants.
Goldberg VM; Stevenson S; Feighan J; Davy D
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):122-9. PubMed ID: 7554621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Oxidized, bioactive implants are rapidly and strongly integrated in bone. Part 1--experimental implants.
Sul YT; Jeong Y; Johansson C; Albrektsson T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 16958691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Histomorphometric evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and thin ion beam-deposited bioceramic surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 19231787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A light and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of electro-discharge-compacted porous titanium implants in rabbit tibia.
Drummond JF; Dominici JT; Sammon PJ; Okazaki K; Geissler R; Lifland MI; Anderson SA; Renshaw W
J Oral Implantol; 1995; 21(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 8699522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Polyphosphoric acid treatment promotes bone regeneration around titanium implants.
Maekawa K; Shimono K; Oshima M; Yoshida Y; Van Meerbeek B; Suzuki K; Kuboki T
J Oral Rehabil; 2009 May; 36(5):362-7. PubMed ID: 19210680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Biological responses of anodized titanium implants under different current voltages.
Choi JW; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lim YJ; Kim SH; Lee JB
J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):889-97. PubMed ID: 17168931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
