1744 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11174732)
21. Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis.
Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; Abel JG; Janusz MT; Lichtenstein SV; MacNab JS; Stanford EA; Chan F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1109-15.e2. PubMed ID: 19379975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves.
Ruel M; Rubens FD; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Bédard P; Hendry PJ; Lam BK; Burwash IG; Goldstein WG; Brais MP; Keon WJ; Mesana TG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2004 Jan; 127(1):149-59. PubMed ID: 14752425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Hancock II bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement: the gold standard of bioprosthetic valves durability?
David TE; Armstrong S; Maganti M
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 Sep; 90(3):775-81. PubMed ID: 20732495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless prosthesis: 7 years' experience in 130 patients.
D'Onofrio A; Auriemma S; Magagna P; Favaro A; Cannarella A; Piccin C; Bilotta M; Abbiate N; Lamascese N; Fabbri A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 134(2):491-5. PubMed ID: 17662795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance of the Carpentier-Edwards SAV and Hancock-II porcine bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.
Jamieson WR; David TE; Feindel CM; Miyagishima RT; Germann E
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 May; 11(3):424-30. PubMed ID: 12056738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Hancock II porcine bioprosthesis. A preliminary report.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Santini F; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Mar; 97(3):415-20. PubMed ID: 2918737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Twenty-five year experience with the St. Jude medical mechanical valve prosthesis.
Toole JM; Stroud MR; Kratz JM; Crumbley AJ; Bradley SM; Crawford FA; Ikonomidis JS
Ann Thorac Surg; 2010 May; 89(5):1402-9. PubMed ID: 20417752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Influence of patient-prosthesis mismatch on long-term results after aortic valve replacement with a stented bioprosthesis.
Frapier JM; Rouvière P; Razcka F; Aymard T; Albat B; Chaptal PA
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jul; 11(4):543-51. PubMed ID: 12150304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
Hartz RS; Fisher EB; Finkelmeier B; DeBoer A; Sanders JH; Moran JM; Michaelis LL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?
Jamieson WR; Gudas VM; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Fradet GJ; Ling H; Germann E; Lichtenstein SV
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Primary triple valve surgery for advanced rheumatic heart disease in Mainland China: a single-center experience with 871 clinical cases.
Han QQ; Xu ZY; Zhang BR; Zou LJ; Hao JH; Huang SD
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2007 May; 31(5):845-50. PubMed ID: 17336080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Aortic valve replacement with Toronto SPV bioprosthesis: optimal patient survival but suboptimal valve durability.
David TE; Feindel CM; Bos J; Ivanov J; Armstrong S
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Jan; 135(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 18179912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
Fann JI; Miller DC; Moore KA; Mitchell RS; Oyer PE; Stinson EB; Robbins RC; Reitz BA; Shumway NE
Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Aortic valve replacement with mitral valve repair compared with combined aortic and mitral valve replacement.
Talwar S; Mathur A; Choudhary SK; Singh R; Kumar AS
Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Oct; 84(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 17888973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Aortic valve replacement with the Sorin Pericarbon Freedom stentless valve: five-year follow up.
Nyawo B; Graham R; Hunter S
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Jan; 16(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 17315382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Long-term clinical results with the Ionescu-Shiley pericardial xenograft.
Masters RG; Pipe AL; Bedard JP; Brais MP; Goldstein WG; Koshal A; Keon WJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Jan; 101(1):81-9. PubMed ID: 1986173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Excellent durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A sixteen-year follow-up study.
Kawachi Y; Tominaga R; Hisahara M; Nakashima A; Yasui H; Tokunaga K
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Dec; 104(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 1453721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Experience with stentless aortic xenografts.
Luciani GB; Auriemma S; Casali G; Barozzi L; Lamascese N; Mazzucco A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):794-800. PubMed ID: 11128787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Medtronic mosaic porcine bioprosthesis: investigational center experience to six years.
Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; MacNab JS; Burr LH; Stanford EA; Janusz MT; Abel JG; Germann E; Cheung A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):54-63. PubMed ID: 15700437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
