These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11175270)

  • 41. In vitro comparison of Kodak Ultra-speed, Ektaspeed, and Ektaspeed Plus, and Agfa M2 Comfort dental x-ray films for the detection of caries.
    Hintze H; Christoffersen L; Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1996 Feb; 81(2):240-4. PubMed ID: 8665322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Sensitometric and image quality performance of "rapid" intraoral film processing techniques.
    Czajka J; Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Jan; 69(817):49-58. PubMed ID: 8785621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of varying processing solution temperature on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of dental film.
    Matthee MJ; Becker PJ; Seeliger JE
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Dec; 45(12):525-8. PubMed ID: 2098942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Sensitometric comparisons of Insight and Ektaspeed Plus films: effects of chemical developer depletion.
    Casanova MS; Haiter-Neto F; Bóscolo FN; de Almeida SM
    Braz Dent J; 2006; 17(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 16924344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Absorbed dose in AgBr in direct film for photon energies ( < 150 keV): relation to optical density. Theoretical calculation and experimental evaluation.
    Helmrot E; Alm Carlsson G
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 402():1-50. PubMed ID: 8677807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Accuracy of radiographic caries diagnosis at different kilovoltages and two film speeds.
    Svenson B; Gröndahl HG; Petersson A; Olving A
    Swed Dent J; 1985; 9(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 3859029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of time and exposure to air on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of three rapid dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ; Seeliger JE; Prinsloo NJ; Swart NG
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1993 Jan; 48(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 9511608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [Comparative study of Agfa-Gavaert, Kodak Ultra-Speed and Kodak Ektaspeed dental radiographic films, processed in Sillib solution].
    Capelozza AL; Alvares LC
    Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1990; 4(2):92-6. PubMed ID: 2135356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A comparison of Ektaspeed and Ultraspeed films using manual and automatic processing solutions.
    Fletcher JC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Jan; 63(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 3468472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. An evaluation of the Sens-A-Ray digital dental imaging system.
    McDonnell D; Price C
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Aug; 22(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 8299829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Optical densities of dental resin composites: a comparison of CCD, storage phosphor, and Ektaspeed plus radiographic film.
    Farman TT; Farman AG; Scarfe WC; Goldsmith LJ
    Gen Dent; 1996; 44(6):532-7. PubMed ID: 9515395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An in vivo evaluation of the diagnostic quality ultra-speed versus insight intraoral dental film.
    Schiff T; Solomon BE
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2004 Nov; 5(4):50-7. PubMed ID: 15558090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Perceived quality of radiographic images after rapid processing of D- and F-speed direct-exposure intraoral x-ray films.
    Bernstein DI; Clark SJ; Scheetz JP; Farman AG; Rosenson B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Oct; 96(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 14561976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of niobium filtration and constant potential on the sensitometric responses of dental radiographic films.
    Price C; McDonnell D
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 1884846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Radiation dosage reduction in general dental practice using digital intraoral radiographic systems.
    Hayakawa Y; Shibuya H; Ota Y; Kuroyanagi K
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 1997 Feb; 38(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 9566150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Assessment of image quality in dental radiography, part 1: phantom validity.
    Yoshiura K; Kawazu T; Chikui T; Tatsumi M; Tokumori K; Tanaka T; Kanda S
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jan; 87(1):115-22. PubMed ID: 9927090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Influence of scattered radiation and tube potential on radiographic contrast: comparison of two different dental X-ray films.
    Helmrot E; Carlsson GA; Eckerdal O; Sandborg M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Aug; 20(3):135-46. PubMed ID: 1807997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Estimated skin exposure as an indicator for comparing radiovisiography (RVG) versus conventional Ektaspeed Plus dental radiography.
    Jones GA; Schuman NJ; Woods MA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1998; 22(2):121-3. PubMed ID: 9643185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Mail survey of dental radiographic techniques and radiation doses in Greece.
    Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC; Tsiklakis K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Nov; 27(6):321-8. PubMed ID: 10895629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [Contrast characteristics of Kodak Ektaspeed and ultra speed periapical films].
    Okano T; Ohta K; Nakamura T
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Jun; 50(2):338-42. PubMed ID: 6578285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.