These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11175274)

  • 1. The effects of different image file formats and image-analysis software programs on dental radiometric digital evaluations.
    Gürdal P; Hildebolt CF; Akdeniz BG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 11175274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproducibility of and file format effect on digital subtraction radiography of simulated external root resorptions.
    Gegler A; Mahl C; Fontanella V
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Jan; 35(1):10-3. PubMed ID: 16421257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Indirect digital images: limit of image compression for diagnosis in endodontics.
    Siragusa M; McDonnell DJ
    Int Endod J; 2002 Dec; 35(12):991-5. PubMed ID: 12653317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of proximal caries in images resulting from different modes of radiographic digitalization.
    Xavier CR; Araujo-Pires AC; Poleti ML; Rubira-Bullen IR; Ferreira O; Capelozza AL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Sep; 40(6):338-43. PubMed ID: 21831972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A five-step approach to digital image manipulation for the radiologist.
    Corl FM; Garland MR; Lawler LP; Fishman EK
    Radiographics; 2002; 22(4):981-92. PubMed ID: 12110727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Swelling archives warrant closer look at compression.
    Schreiber D
    Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(5):36-9. PubMed ID: 14603591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality of compressed medical images.
    Shiao YH; Chen TJ; Chuang KS; Lin CH; Chuang CC
    J Digit Imaging; 2007 Jun; 20(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 17318703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Joint Photographic Experts Group compression of intraoral radiographs for image transmission on the World Wide Web.
    Yuasa H; Ariji Y; Ohki M; Naitoh M; Shiojima M; Ushida M; Ariji E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1999 Jul; 88(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 10442952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Free DICOM image viewing and processing software for your desktop computer: what's available and what it can do for you.
    Escott EJ; Rubinstein D
    Radiographics; 2003; 23(5):1341-57. PubMed ID: 12975521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): free DICOM image viewing and processing software for the Macintosh computer: what's available and what it can do for you.
    Escott EJ; Rubinstein D
    Radiographics; 2004; 24(6):1763-77. PubMed ID: 15537984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of image compression of digital lateral cephalograms on the reproducibility of cephalometric points.
    Duarte H; Vieck R; Siqueira DF; Angelieri F; Bommarito S; Dalben G; Sannomiya EK
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):393-400. PubMed ID: 19700533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image editing with Adobe Photoshop 6.0.
    Caruso RD; Postel GC
    Radiographics; 2002; 22(4):993-1002. PubMed ID: 12110728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image compression in morphometry studies requiring 21 CFR Part 11 compliance: procedure is key with TIFFs and various JPEG compression strengths.
    Tengowski MW
    Toxicol Pathol; 2004; 32(2):258-63. PubMed ID: 15200165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Grading, image analysis, and stereopsis of digitally compressed fundus images.
    Lee MS; Shin DS; Berger JW
    Retina; 2000; 20(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 10872933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of wavelet and Joint Photographic Experts Group lossy compression methods applied to medical images.
    Iyriboz TA; Zukoski MJ; Hopper KD; Stagg PL
    J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):14-7. PubMed ID: 10342156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of compression on the image quality of digital panoramic radiographs.
    Yasar F; Yesilova E; Apaydın B
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Jun; 16(3):719-26. PubMed ID: 21732088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of JPEG2000 compression on landmark identification of lateral cephalometric digital radiographs.
    Abdelkarim A; Nummikoski P; Gakunga P; Hatch JP; Dove SB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):518-524. PubMed ID: 20889059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of JPEG compression on the diagnostic accuracy of periapical images in the detection of root fracture.
    Noujeim M; Geha H; Shintaku W; Bechara B; Kashi KA
    Dent Traumatol; 2012 Jun; 28(3):233-7. PubMed ID: 22066949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of Image Compression on Linear Measurements of Digital Panoramic Radiographs.
    Provedel LF; Pimentel BN; Jesus TM; Lacerda AP; Rubira-Bullen IR; Sarmento VA
    Braz Dent J; 2016; 27(6):757-760. PubMed ID: 27982191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DICOM file format has better radiographic image quality than other file formats: an objective study.
    Miranda-Viana M; Fontenele RC; Nogueira-Reis F; Farias-Gomes A; Oliveira ML; Freitas DQ; Haiter-Neto F
    Braz Dent J; 2023; 34(4):150-157. PubMed ID: 37909638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.