These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11175716)

  • 1. EU--US experts urge stiffer rules for biotech foods.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Feb; 19(2):106-7. PubMed ID: 11175716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Proposed rules issued for bioengineered foods.
    Formanek R
    FDA Consum; 2001; 35(2):9-11. PubMed ID: 11444252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FDA not yet moved by biotech food critics.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Jan; 18(1):15. PubMed ID: 10625375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EU food agency circles round biotech.
    Hodgson J
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Oct; 17(10):945. PubMed ID: 10504684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. US, EU prepare for further biotech food dispute.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Oct; 19(10):897. PubMed ID: 11581641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. US animal biotech regulations "may not be adequate".
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Oct; 20(10):959. PubMed ID: 12355099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Substantial equivalence: its uses and abuses.
    Miller HI
    Nat Biotechnol; 1999 Nov; 17(11):1042-3. PubMed ID: 10545866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SCIENCE POLICY. U.S. to review agricultural biotech regulations.
    Servick K
    Science; 2015 Jul; 349(6244):131. PubMed ID: 26160926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. US attacks EU gene-food labelling move.
    Nature; 1997 Jun; 387(6636):833. PubMed ID: 9202104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is there a future for GMOs?
    Beringer JE
    Biologist (London); 2000 Apr; 47(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 11190234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The science and politics of plant biotechnology--a personal perspective.
    Vasil IK
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):849-51. PubMed ID: 12894193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. US Presidential transition prompts biotech policy frenzy.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Mar; 19(3):183-4. PubMed ID: 11231515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Biotechnology, especially genetic modification, and legislation].
    de Sitter H; Peters PW
    Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 2002 May; 127(10):322-30. PubMed ID: 12056264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Europe and US in confrontation over GM food labelling criteria.
    Masood E
    Nature; 1999 Apr; 398(6729):641. PubMed ID: 10227274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modification and consumer information: modern biotechnology and the regulation of information.
    Beales JH
    Food Drug Law J; 2000; 55(1):105-17. PubMed ID: 12322718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consumer acceptance of biotechnology and the role of second generation technologies in the USA and Europe.
    Lusk JL; Rozan A
    Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Aug; 23(8):386-7. PubMed ID: 15953650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. GM foods debate needs a recipe for restoring trust.
    Nature; 1999 Apr; 398(6729):639. PubMed ID: 10227273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EU reflects European public opinion.
    Borch K; Lassen J; Jørgensen RB
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):976. PubMed ID: 12949553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biotechnology and the food label: a legal perspective.
    Degnan FH
    Food Drug Law J; 2000; 55(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 11824462
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of training programmes in biotechnology safety and risk assessment.
    Riazuddin S
    Bioessays; 1988 Oct; 9(4):131-2. PubMed ID: 3228452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.