102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11176484)
41. HER2 expression and gene amplification in pT2a Gleason score 6 prostate cancer incidentally detected in cystoprostatectomies: comparison with clinically detected androgen-dependent and androgen-independent cancer.
Montironi R; Mazzucchelli R; Barbisan F; Stramazzotti D; Santinelli A; Scarpelli M; Lòpez Beltran A
Hum Pathol; 2006 Sep; 37(9):1137-44. PubMed ID: 16938518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Ki-67 in screen-detected, low-grade, low-stage prostate cancer, relation to prostate-specific antigen doubling time, Gleason score and prostate-specific antigen relapse after radical prostatectomy.
Khatami A; Hugosson J; Wang W; Damber JE
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2009; 43(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 18949633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Prognostic factors for survival of patients with pathological Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: differences in outcome between primary Gleason grades 3 and 4.
Lau WK; Blute ML; Bostwick DG; Weaver AL; Sebo TJ; Zincke H
J Urol; 2001 Nov; 166(5):1692-7. PubMed ID: 11586204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Potentially advanced malignancies detected by screening for prostate carcinoma after an interval of 4 years.
Postma R; Roobol M; Schröder FH; van der Kwast TH
Cancer; 2004 Mar; 100(5):968-75. PubMed ID: 14983492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Is additional testing necessary in men with prostate-specific antigen levels of 1.0 ng/mL or less in a population-based screening setting? (ERSPC, section Rotterdam).
Roobol MJ; Roobol DW; Schröder FH
Urology; 2005 Feb; 65(2):343-6. PubMed ID: 15708050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The impact of discordance between biopsy and pathological Gleason scores on survival after radical prostatectomy.
Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ; Crispen PL; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Sebo TJ; Blute ML
J Urol; 2009 Jan; 181(1):95-104; discussion 104. PubMed ID: 19012937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [Diagnosis based on prostate needle biopsy: inadequate correlation between pathologic results and clinical course for individual prognosis].
van der Kwast TH; Hoedemaeker RF; Schröder FH
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Apr; 149(18):972-6. PubMed ID: 15903037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. T1c prostate cancer detection rate and pathologic characteristics: comparison between patients with serum prostate-specific antigen range of 3.0 to 4.0 ng/mL and 4.1 to 10.0 ng/mL in Korean population.
Park HK; Hong SK; Byun SS; Lee SE
Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):85-8. PubMed ID: 16806412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. hK2 and free PSA, a prognostic combination in predicting minimal prostate cancer in screen-detected men within the PSA range 4-10 ng/ml.
Raaijmakers R; de Vries SH; Blijenberg BG; Wildhagen MF; Postma R; Bangma CH; Darte C; Schröder FH
Eur Urol; 2007 Nov; 52(5):1358-64. PubMed ID: 17499425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Relationship between systematic biopsies and histological features of 222 radical prostatectomy specimens: lack of prediction of tumor significance for men with nonpalpable prostate cancer.
Noguchi M; Stamey TA; McNeal JE; Yemoto CM
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):104-9; discussion 109-10. PubMed ID: 11435833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The National Prostate Cancer Register in Sweden 1998-2002: trends in incidence, treatment and survival.
Varenhorst E; Garmo H; Holmberg L; Adolfsson J; Damber JE; Hellström M; Hugosson J; Lundgren R; Stattin P; Törnblom M; Johansson JE
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2005; 39(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 16019764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Five-year results of prostate specific antigen (PSA) screening in Yokosuka City--comparative study between PSA-screened group and non-screened group].
Noguchi S; Satomi Y; Sakai N; Takemura H; Ikeda S; Okui N; Kobayashi M; Fukuoka H; Furuhata A
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2008 Mar; 54(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 18411775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Detection rates and biologic significance of prostate cancer with PSA less than 4.0 ng/mL: observation and clinical implications from Tyrol screening project.
Pelzer AE; Tewari A; Bektic J; Berger AP; Frauscher F; Bartsch G; Horninger W
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):1029-33. PubMed ID: 16286118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Prognostic value of DNA ploidy, bcl-2 and p53 in localized prostate adenocarcinoma incidentally discovered at transurethral prostatectomy.
Abaza R; Diaz LK; Laskin WB; Pins MR
J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2701-5. PubMed ID: 17085199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Pathological characteristics of prostate cancer detected through prostate specific antigen based screening.
Loeb S; Gonzalez CM; Roehl KA; Han M; Antenor JA; Yap RL; Catalona WJ
J Urol; 2006 Mar; 175(3 Pt 1):902-6. PubMed ID: 16469576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Impact of screening on prostate cancer rates and trends.
Mettlin C
Microsc Res Tech; 2000 Dec; 51(5):415-8. PubMed ID: 11074610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Trends in prostate needle biopsy diagnosis. A ten year experience of a medical center in Taiwan.
Kuo YJ; Lin SF; Chang YH; Pan CC
Pathol Int; 2012 Mar; 62(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 22360507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Time trends in clinical risk stratification for prostate cancer: implications for outcomes (data from CaPSURE).
Cooperberg MR; Lubeck DP; Mehta SS; Carroll PR;
J Urol; 2003 Dec; 170(6 Pt 2):S21-5; discussion S26-7. PubMed ID: 14610406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Prostate cancer grade assignment: the effect of chronological, interpretive and translation bias.
Kondylis FI; Moriarty RP; Bostwick D; Schellhammer PF
J Urol; 2003 Oct; 170(4 Pt 1):1189-93. PubMed ID: 14501722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Prostate cancer in a young adult : a case report].
Yasuda M; Matsumura N; Okuda Y; Shimizu N; Yamamoto Y; Minami T; Hayashi T; Tsuji H; Nozawa M; Ishii T; Yoshimura K; Uemura H
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2011 Oct; 57(10):585-8. PubMed ID: 22089160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
