These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11177062)

  • 1. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressures.
    Park MK; Menard SW; Yuan C
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2001 Jan; 155(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 11177062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in blood pressure levels obtained by auscultatory and oscillometric methods.
    Weaver MG; Park MK; Lee DH
    Am J Dis Child; 1990 Aug; 144(8):911-4. PubMed ID: 2378339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of oscillometric devices in children and adults.
    Chiolero A; Paradis G; Lambert M
    Blood Press; 2010 Aug; 19(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 20156034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auscultatory versus oscillometric measurement of blood pressure in octogenarians.
    Rosholm JU; Arnspang S; Matzen L; Jacobsen IA
    Blood Press; 2012 Oct; 21(5):269-72. PubMed ID: 22545576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The San Antonio Biethnic Children's Blood Pressure Study: auscultatory findings.
    Menard SW; Park MK; Yuan CH
    J Pediatr Health Care; 1999; 13(5):237-44. PubMed ID: 10776199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of automatic oscillometric arterial pressure measurement with conventional auscultatory measurement in the labour ward.
    Hasan MA; Thomas TA; Prys-Roberts C
    Br J Anaesth; 1993 Feb; 70(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 8435255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of the shapes of the oscillometric pulse amplitude envelopes and their characteristic ratios on the differences between auscultatory and oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Vacher E; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 17890968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of intra-arterial and automated oscillometric blood pressure measurement methods in postoperative hypertensive patients.
    Loubser PG
    Med Instrum; 1986; 20(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 3784934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical assessment of the DINAMAP ProCare monitor in an adult population according to the British Hypertension Society Protocol.
    de Greeff A; Reggiori F; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 17303988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of resting blood pressure measurement and classification using an oscillometric device in children with chronic kidney disease.
    Flynn JT; Pierce CB; Miller ER; Charleston J; Samuels JA; Kupferman J; Furth SL; Warady BA;
    J Pediatr; 2012 Mar; 160(3):434-440.e1. PubMed ID: 22048052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic blood pressure measurement: the oscillometric waveform shape is a potential contributor to differences between oscillometric and auscultatory pressure measurements.
    Amoore JN; Lemesre Y; Murray IC; Mieke S; King ST; Smith FE; Murray A
    J Hypertens; 2008 Jan; 26(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 18090538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric BP measurements in children with obesity and their effect on the diagnosis of arterial hypertension.
    Fonseca-Reyes S; Romero-Velarde E; Torres-Gudiño E; Illescas-Zarate D; Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM
    Arch Cardiol Mex; 2018; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 28238543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is one measurement enough to evaluate blood pressure among adolescents? A blood pressure screening experience in more than 9000 children with a subset comparison of auscultatory to mercury measurements.
    Negroni-Balasquide X; Bell CS; Samuel J; Samuels JA
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2016 Feb; 10(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 26875474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of a non-mercury digital auscultatory device according to the European Hypertension Society protocol: Rossmax Mandaus II.
    Tasker F; de Greeff A; Liu B; Shennan AH
    Blood Press Monit; 2009 Jun; 14(3):121-4. PubMed ID: 19417636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Blood pressure measurement by oscillometric and auscultatory methods in normotensive pregnant women.
    Vigato ES; Lamas JLT
    Rev Bras Enferm; 2019 Dec; 72(suppl 3):162-169. PubMed ID: 31851249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Oscillometric finger blood pressure versus brachial auscultative blood pressure recording.
    Iyriboz Y
    J Fam Pract; 1990 Oct; 31(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 2212968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of blood pressure measurement by the Dinamap monitor in infants and children.
    Park MK; Menard SM
    Pediatrics; 1987 Jun; 79(6):907-14. PubMed ID: 3588145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of the Dinamap 1846 XT automated blood pressure monitor.
    Beaubien ER; Card CM; Card SE; Biem HJ; Wilson TW
    J Hum Hypertens; 2002 Sep; 16(9):647-52. PubMed ID: 12214262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of overcuffing on the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure measurements.
    Ringrose J; Millay J; Babwick SA; Neil M; Langkaas LA; Padwal R
    J Am Soc Hypertens; 2015 Jul; 9(7):563-8. PubMed ID: 26101170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.