These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11178305)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive cardiac operations.
    Ferraris VA; Ferraris SP
    Heart Surg Forum; 2001; 4 Suppl 1():S30-4. PubMed ID: 11178305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative economic analyses of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery.
    Gray DT; Veenstra DL
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Mar; 125(3):618-24. PubMed ID: 12658204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combination of minimally invasive coronary bypass and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of double-vessel coronary disease: Two-year follow-up of a new hybrid procedure compared with "on-pump" double bypass grafting.
    de Cannière D; Jansens JL; Goldschmidt-Clermont P; Barvais L; Decroly P; Stoupel E
    Am Heart J; 2001 Oct; 142(4):563-70. PubMed ID: 11579343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and economic outcomes of multivessel coronary stenting compared with bypass surgery: a single-center US experience.
    Reynolds MR; Neil N; Ho KK; Berezin R; Cosgrove RS; Lager RA; Sirois C; Johnson RG; Cohen DJ
    Am Heart J; 2003 Feb; 145(2):334-42. PubMed ID: 12595853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical costs and quality of life 10 to 12 years after randomization to angioplasty or bypass surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease.
    Hlatky MA; Boothroyd DB; Melsop KA; Brooks MM; Mark DB; Pitt B; Reeder GS; Rogers WJ; Ryan TJ; Whitlow PL; Wiens RD
    Circulation; 2004 Oct; 110(14):1960-6. PubMed ID: 15451795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass grafts versus percutaneous coronary intervention for revascularization of high-risk patients.
    Stroupe KT; Morrison DA; Hlatky MA; Barnett PG; Cao L; Lyttle C; Hynes DM; Henderson WG;
    Circulation; 2006 Sep; 114(12):1251-7. PubMed ID: 16966588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of the real-world use of drug-eluting stents at 9-month follow-up: results from the Sicilian DES Registry.
    Tamburino C; Barbagallo R; Capodanno D; di Matteo S; Colombo GL; Recchia M; Ciriminna S;
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2009 Apr; 10(4):322-9. PubMed ID: 19430343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is minimally invasive harvesting of the great saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass surgery a cost-effective technique?
    Rao C; Aziz O; Deeba S; Chow A; Jones C; Ni Z; Papastavrou L; Rahman S; Darzi A; Athanasiou T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 135(4):809-15. PubMed ID: 18374760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct coronary stenting compared with stenting after predilatation is feasible, safe, and more cost-effective in selected patients: evidence to date indicating similar late outcomes.
    Ijsselmuiden AJ; Tangelder GJ; Cotton JM; Vaijifdar B; Kiemeneij F; Slagboom T; v d Wieken R; Serruys PW; Laarman GJ
    Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2003; 5(3):143-50. PubMed ID: 12959731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hybrid coronary revascularization in the era of drug-eluting stents.
    Murphy GJ; Bryan AJ; Angelini GD
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2004 Nov; 78(5):1861-7. PubMed ID: 15511503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cost-effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of complex coronary stenoses: results from the Sirolimus-Eluting Balloon Expandable Stent in the Treatment of Patients With De Novo Native Coronary Artery Lesions (SIRIUS) trial.
    Cohen DJ; Bakhai A; Shi C; Githiora L; Lavelle T; Berezin RH; Leon MB; Moses JW; Carrozza JP; Zidar JP; Kuntz RE;
    Circulation; 2004 Aug; 110(5):508-14. PubMed ID: 15262844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review of recent US cost estimates of revascularization.
    Nagle PC; Smith AW
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Oct; 10(11 Suppl):S370-6. PubMed ID: 15603246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting decreases hospital stay and cost.
    King RC; Reece TB; Hurst JL; Shockey KS; Tribble CG; Spotnitz WD; Kron IL
    Ann Surg; 1997 Jun; 225(6):805-9; discussion 809-11. PubMed ID: 9230821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resource use and cost of initial coronary revascularization. Coronary angioplasty versus coronary bypass surgery.
    Hlatky MA; Lipscomb J; Nelson C; Califf RM; Pryor D; Wallace AG; Mark DB
    Circulation; 1990 Nov; 82(5 Suppl):IV208-13. PubMed ID: 2225406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interventional cardiology versus minimally invasive cardiac surgery.
    Park JW
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S117-8. PubMed ID: 10613571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost effectiveness of paclitaxel-eluting stents for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization: results from the TAXUS-IV Trial.
    Bakhai A; Stone GW; Mahoney E; Lavelle TA; Shi C; Berezin RH; Lahue BJ; Clark MA; Lacey MJ; Russell ME; Ellis SG; Hermiller JB; Cox DA; Cohen DJ;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Jul; 48(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16843171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Economic evaluation of different minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of coronary artery disease.
    Reichenspurner H; Boehm D; Detter C; Schiller W; Reichart B
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1999 Nov; 16 Suppl 2():S76-9. PubMed ID: 10613562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Comparison of the cost effectiveness of treatment of acute myocardial infarct with primary angioplasty and thrombolysis ].
    Golán L; Simek S; Linhart A; Cahlík T; Palecek T; Lubanda JC; Korínek J; Beran S; Aschermann M
    Vnitr Lek; 2003 Feb; 49(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 12728575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Balloon angioplasty versus bypass grafting in the era of coronary stenting.
    Ekstein S; Elami A; Merin G; Gotsman MS; Lotan C
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2002 Aug; 4(8):583-9. PubMed ID: 12183860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Coronary stenting: costly or cost-effective?
    Cohen DJ; Baim DS
    J Invasive Cardiol; 1995; 7 Suppl A():36A-42A. PubMed ID: 10155115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.