32 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11180446)
1. A transmission disequilibrium test for general pedigrees that is robust to the presence of random genotyping errors and any number of untyped parents.
Gordon D; Haynes C; Johnnidis C; Patel SB; Bowcock AM; Ott J
Eur J Hum Genet; 2004 Sep; 12(9):752-61. PubMed ID: 15162128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Weighting affected sib pairs by marker informativity.
Franke D; Ziegler A
Am J Hum Genet; 2005 Aug; 77(2):230-41. PubMed ID: 15986318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Model-free tests for genetic linkage.
Amos CI; Schnell A; Chen WV; Elston RC
Curr Protoc Hum Genet; 2012 Oct; Chapter 1():Unit1.8. PubMed ID: 23074068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of ascertainment on penetrance estimates for rare variants: Implications for establishing pathogenicity and for genetic counselling.
Paterson AD; Seok SC; Vieland VJ
PLoS One; 2023; 18(9):e0290336. PubMed ID: 37733810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. KELVIN: a software package for rigorous measurement of statistical evidence in human genetics.
Vieland VJ; Huang Y; Seok SC; Burian J; Catalyurek U; O'Connell J; Segre A; Valentine-Cooper W
Hum Hered; 2011; 72(4):276-88. PubMed ID: 22189470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Family-based linkage disequilibrium tests using general pedigrees.
Shugart YY; Chen L; Li R; Beaty T
Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 376():141-9. PubMed ID: 17984543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Detecting linkage disequilibrium in the presence of locus heterogeneity.
Wang D; Huang J
Ann Hum Genet; 2006 May; 70(Pt 3):397-409. PubMed ID: 16674561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transmission/disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits.
Zhu X; Elston RC
Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Jan; 20(1):57-74. PubMed ID: 11119297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MOD-score analysis with simple pedigrees: an overview of likelihood-based linkage methods.
Strauch K
Hum Hered; 2007; 64(3):192-202. PubMed ID: 17536213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of four sib-pair linkage methods for analyzing sibships with more than two affecteds: interest of the binomial maximum likelihood approach.
Abel L; Alcais A; Mallet A
Genet Epidemiol; 1998; 15(4):371-90. PubMed ID: 9671987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The score statistic of the LD-lod analysis: detecting linkage adaptive to linkage disequilibrium.
Huang J; Jiang Y
Hum Hered; 2001; 52(2):83-98. PubMed ID: 11474209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Power comparisons between the TDT and two likelihood-based methods.
Slager SL; Huang J; Vieland VJ
Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 20(2):192-209. PubMed ID: 11180446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Testing linkage and gene x environment interaction: comparison of different affected sib-pair methods.
Dizier MH; Selinger-Leneman H; Genin E
Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jul; 25(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 12813728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
