These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Adults' preferences for side-of-hold as portrayed in paintings of the Madonna and Child. Harris LJ; Cardénas RA; Spradlin MP; Almerigi JB Laterality; 2009 Nov; 14(6):590-617. PubMed ID: 19340631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art. Calvo-Merino B; Jola C; Glaser DE; Haggard P Conscious Cogn; 2008 Sep; 17(3):911-22. PubMed ID: 18207423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Why not ask the patient? An evaluation of the aesthetic surroundings in hospitals by patients. Caspari S; Nåden D; Eriksson K Qual Manag Health Care; 2007; 16(3):280-92. PubMed ID: 17627223 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A Farewell to Art: Aesthetics as a Topic in Psychology and Neuroscience. Skov M; Nadal M Perspect Psychol Sci; 2020 May; 15(3):630-642. PubMed ID: 32027577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Brain intersections of aesthetics and morals: perspectives from biology, neuroscience, and evolution. Zaidel DW; Nadal M Perspect Biol Med; 2011; 54(3):367-80. PubMed ID: 21857127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Abstract art preferences and temperament traits: a study in the psychology of aesthetics. Kloss MG; Dreger RM J Pers Assess; 1971 Aug; 35(4):375-8. PubMed ID: 5566753 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Predicting beauty: fractal dimension and visual complexity in art. Forsythe A; Nadal M; Sheehy N; Cela-Conde CJ; Sawey M Br J Psychol; 2011 Feb; 102(1):49-70. PubMed ID: 21241285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The aesthetics of simple figures. McManus IC Br J Psychol; 1980 Nov; 71(Pt 4):505-24. PubMed ID: 7437674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Increased hedonic differences despite increases in hedonic range. Zellner DA; Jones K; Morino J; Cogan ES; Jennings EM; Parker S Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jul; 72(5):1261-5. PubMed ID: 20601708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Personality and preference for painting style. Juhasz JB; Paxson L Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Apr; 46(2):347-9. PubMed ID: 662531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. When Challenging Art Gets Liked: Evidences for a Dual Preference Formation Process for Fluent and Non-Fluent Portraits. Belke B; Leder H; Carbon CC PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0131796. PubMed ID: 26309095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Greater art classification does not necessarily predict better liking: Evidence from graffiti and other visual arts. Szubielska M; Ho R Psych J; 2022 Oct; 11(5):656-659. PubMed ID: 34288523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Art, affect and aesthetics. Kirshner L Int J Psychoanal; 2000 Feb; 81 ( Pt 1)():162-3. PubMed ID: 10816855 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Concrete and abstract thinking styles and art preferences in a sample of serious art collectors. Gridley MC Psychol Rep; 2006 Jun; 98(3):853-7. PubMed ID: 16933684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The artful mind meets art history: toward a psycho-historical framework for the science of art appreciation. Bullot NJ; Reber R Behav Brain Sci; 2013 Apr; 36(2):123-37. PubMed ID: 23507091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The biological roots of aesthetics and art. Heinrich B Evol Psychol; 2013 Jul; 11(3):743-61. PubMed ID: 23864302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Gaze shifts do not affect preference judgments of graphic patterns. Nittono H; Wada Y Percept Mot Skills; 2009 Aug; 109(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 19831089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]