These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

271 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11182620)

  • 21. Adhesion formation to incisional abdominal wound in response to polyamide "6" and polyglactin "910" sutures.
    Ansari AG
    J Pak Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 42(8):184-5. PubMed ID: 1433796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the stomach and colon.
    Hastings JC; Winkle WV; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 May; 140(5):701-7. PubMed ID: 1145404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prevention of incisional hernia using different suture materials for closing the abdominal wall: a comparison of PDS, Vicryl and Prolene in a rat model.
    van Steensel S; van den Hil LCL; Bloemen A; Gijbels MJ; Breukink SO; Melenhorst J; Lenaerts K; Bouvy ND
    Hernia; 2020 Feb; 24(1):67-78. PubMed ID: 31111322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mass closure of the abdominal wound with delayed absorbable suture in surgery for gynecologic cancer.
    Hoffman MS; Villa A; Roberts WS; Fiorica JV; LaPolla JP; Barton DP; Cavanagh D
    J Reprod Med; 1991 May; 36(5):356-8. PubMed ID: 2061883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An experimental study of suture of colonic wounds in the rabbit.
    Robbs JV
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1977 Aug; 145(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 877844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable sutures for microsurgical vasovasostomy in rats.
    Sheynkin YR; Li PS; Magid ML; Carlson D; Chen EC; Goldstein M
    Urology; 1999 Jun; 53(6):1235-8. PubMed ID: 10367861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Suture technics for the abdominal wall after midline laparotomy].
    Becker M
    Tierarztl Prax; 1985; 13(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 3907012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Non-absorbable Polypropylene (Prolene®) and Delayed Absorbable Polyglactin 910 (Vicryl®) Suture Material in Mass Closure of Vertical Laparotomy Wounds.
    Pandey S; Singh M; Singh K; Sandhu S
    Indian J Surg; 2013 Aug; 75(4):306-10. PubMed ID: 24426459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of absorbable with nonabsorbable sutures in closure of facial skin wounds.
    Parell GJ; Becker GD
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2003; 5(6):488-90. PubMed ID: 14623686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of 10-0 polyglycolic acid and polyglactin suture in rabbit limbal wounds.
    Sugar A
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1980 Jan; 11(1):22-4. PubMed ID: 6244525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Performance comparison of nylon and an absorbable suture material (Polyglactin 910) in the closure of punch biopsy sites.
    Gabel EA; Jimenez GP; Eaglstein WH; Kerdel FA; Falanga V
    Dermatol Surg; 2000 Aug; 26(8):750-2; discussion 752-3. PubMed ID: 10940061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of different suture materials on wound healing and infection in subcutaneous closure techniques.
    Sönmez K; Bahar B; Karabulut R; Gülbahar O; Poyraz A; Türkyilmaz Z; Sancak B; Başaklar AC
    B-ENT; 2009; 5(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 19902850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparison of 2 different suture patterns for skin closure of canine ovariohysterectomy.
    Sylvestre A; Wilson J; Hare J
    Can Vet J; 2002 Sep; 43(9):699-702. PubMed ID: 12240527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A 28-day study of the effect of Coated VICRYL* Plus Antibacterial Suture (coated polyglactin 910 suture with triclosan) on wound healing in guinea pig linear incisional skin wounds.
    Storch M; Perry LC; Davidson JM; Ward JJ
    Surg Infect (Larchmt); 2002; 3 Suppl 1():S89-98. PubMed ID: 12573043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Incisional hernia after abdominal closure with slowly absorbable versus fast absorbable, antibacterial-coated sutures.
    Justinger C; Slotta JE; Schilling MK
    Surgery; 2012 Mar; 151(3):398-403. PubMed ID: 22088813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of suture materials on healing wounds of the bladder.
    Hastings JC; Van Winkle W; Barker E; Hines D; Nichols W
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jun; 140(6):933-7. PubMed ID: 1129685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Study on the mechanical properties of sutures in the process of suturing].
    Zhang L; Dai A; Li W; Zhou Z
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 36(3):386-392. PubMed ID: 31232540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Prolene and vicryl as synthetic sutures for intradermal suture technics].
    Knote G; Bohmert H
    Fortschr Med; 1978 Feb; 96(6):276-80. PubMed ID: 340370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Midline abdominal wall closure: a new prophylactic mesh concept.
    Bellón JM; López-Hervás P; Rodríguez M; García-Honduvilla N; Pascual G; Buján J
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Oct; 203(4):490-7. PubMed ID: 17000392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Does the Choice of Suture Materials Affect the Vas Deferens after Hernia Ring Closure in Inguinal Hernia Surgery: An Experimental Study in Rats.
    Fung AC; Ye HY; Lau TW; Lui VC; Wong KK
    J Pediatr Surg; 2023 Jul; 58(7):1301-1305. PubMed ID: 36894446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.