These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. New Zealand GMO incident highlights lack of standardized tests. Norrie C Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):861. PubMed ID: 12205493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Toxicology. Panel urges further study of biotech corn. Kaiser J Science; 2000 Dec; 290(5498):1867. PubMed ID: 11187032 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The difficulties of defining the term "GM". Ramsay T Science; 2004 Mar; 303(5665):1765-9; author reply 1765-9. PubMed ID: 15052702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Agricultural biotech: the rice squad. Surridge C Nature; 2002 Apr; 416(6881):576-8. PubMed ID: 11948321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. GM crops: science, politics and communication. Arntzen CJ; Coghlan A; Johnson B; Peacock J; Rodemeyer M Nat Rev Genet; 2003 Oct; 4(10):839-43. PubMed ID: 14526380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Taco dispute underscores need for standardized tests. Dorey E Nat Biotechnol; 2000 Nov; 18(11):1136-7. PubMed ID: 11062423 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. . . . as Brazilian scientists protest at GM ban. Bonalume Neto R Nature; 1999 Aug; 400(6744):495. PubMed ID: 10448845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Will genetically modified foods be allergenic? Taylor SL; Hefle SL J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 May; 107(5):765-71. PubMed ID: 11344340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. US food-safety body hears protests over genetically modified food. Macilwain C Nature; 1999 Dec; 402(6762):571. PubMed ID: 10604452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. GMO contamination of seeds. Haslberger A Nat Biotechnol; 2001 Jul; 19(7):613. PubMed ID: 11433264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pharming in crop commodities. Stewart CN Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 26(11):1222-3. PubMed ID: 18997756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. US academy study finds GM foods are safe...but critics claim the panel was biased. Macilwain C Nature; 2000 Apr; 404(6779):693. PubMed ID: 10783856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]