These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11183628)

  • 21. Priority setting in practice: participants opinions on vertical and horizontal priority setting for reallocation.
    Waldau S; Lindholm L; Wiechel AH
    Health Policy; 2010 Aug; 96(3):245-54. PubMed ID: 20227128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cost-effectiveness and equity impacts of three HPV vaccination programmes for school-aged girls in New Zealand.
    Blakely T; Kvizhinadze G; Karvonen T; Pearson AL; Smith M; Wilson N
    Vaccine; 2014 May; 32(22):2645-56. PubMed ID: 24662710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Economics, public health and health care purchasing: the Tayside experience of programme budgeting and marginal analysis.
    Ruta DA; Donaldson C; Gilray I
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 1996 Oct; 1(4):185-93. PubMed ID: 10180869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Acceptability of programme budgeting and marginal analysis as a tool for routine priority setting in Indigenous health.
    Otim ME; Asante AD; Kelaher M; Anderson IP; Jan S
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2016 Jul; 31(3):277-95. PubMed ID: 25758840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. QALYs and the integration of claims in health-care rationing.
    Anand P
    Health Care Anal; 1999; 7(3):239-53. PubMed ID: 10724553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Priorities in care and services for elderly people: a path without guidelines?
    Bergmark A; Parker MG; Thorslund M
    J Med Ethics; 2000 Oct; 26(5):312-8. PubMed ID: 11055031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Changing priority setting practice: the role of implementation in practice change.
    Cornelissen E; Mitton C; Davidson A; Reid RC; Hole R; Visockas AM; Smith N
    Health Policy; 2014 Aug; 117(2):266-74. PubMed ID: 24815208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A 'fair innings' for efficiency in health services?
    Bosanquet N
    J Med Ethics; 2001 Aug; 27(4):228-33. PubMed ID: 11479352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clarifying efficiency-equity tradeoffs through explicit criteria, with a focus on developing countries.
    James C; Carrin G; Savedoff W; Hanvoravongchai P
    Health Care Anal; 2005 Mar; 13(1):33-51. PubMed ID: 15889680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Determining and broadening the definition of impact from implementing a rational priority setting approach in a healthcare organization.
    Cornelissen E; Mitton C; Davidson A; Reid C; Hole R; Visockas AM; Smith N
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Aug; 114():1-9. PubMed ID: 24887012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Priority setting in health - a political economy perspective.
    Goddard M; Hauck K; Smith PC
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2006 Jan; 1(Pt 1):79-90. PubMed ID: 18634704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Priority setting in practice: what is the best way to compare costs and benefits?
    Wilson EC; Peacock SJ; Ruta D
    Health Econ; 2009 Apr; 18(4):467-78. PubMed ID: 18561215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Receptive rationing: reflections and suggestions for priority setters in health care.
    Williams I
    J Health Organ Manag; 2015; 29(6):701-10. PubMed ID: 26394253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ethics and economics: does programme budgeting and marginal analysis contribute to fair priority setting?
    Gibson J; Mitton C; Martin D; Donaldson C; Singer P
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2006 Jan; 11(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 16378530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Economic evaluation and rationing: is age an adequate criteria?].
    Santos-Eggimann B
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2001 Nov; 121(11):831-5. PubMed ID: 11765569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Decentralizing resource allocation: early experiences with district health boards in New Zealand.
    Ashton T; Tenbensel T; Cumming J; Barnett P
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2008 Apr; 13(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 18416917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The value of health care: what can we learn from Oregon?
    Street A; Richardson J
    Aust Health Rev; 1992; 15(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 10119044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Outcomes-based resource allocation for indigenous health services: a model for northern Australia?
    McDermott R; Beaver C; Zhao Y
    Health Policy; 1997 Jan; 39(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 10164907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The best of health 3. Are we doing the right things, and are we doing those things right?
    N Z Health Hospital; 1997; 49(6):20. PubMed ID: 10537986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Priority setting in healthcare: towards guidelines for the program budgeting and marginal analysis framework.
    Peacock SJ; Mitton C; Ruta D; Donaldson C; Bate A; Hedden L
    Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2010 Oct; 10(5):539-52. PubMed ID: 20950070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.