258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11183854)
1. Involve physicians and coders in measuring and improving clinical outcomes.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2000 Feb; 25(2):17-21. PubMed ID: 11183854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multilevel reviews for coding accuracy.
Stavely S
Top Health Inf Manage; 2000 Nov; 21(2):30-3. PubMed ID: 11143277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Best practices for improving revenue capture through documentation.
Richter E; Shelton A; Yu Y
Healthc Financ Manage; 2007 Jun; 61(6):44-7. PubMed ID: 17571707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ongoing coding reviews: ways to ensure quality.
Thompson NS; Koch D
J AHIMA; 1999 Jan; 70(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 10339004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Documentation program nets hospital 1 million dollars.
Hosp Case Manag; 2006 Aug; 14(8):118, 123-6. PubMed ID: 16872054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Developing documentation guidelines?
Koepke M
J Am Med Rec Assoc; 1985 Feb; 56(2):38-40. PubMed ID: 10310978
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Team approach to charting: medical staff join in.
Rice J; Rother C
Leadersh Health Serv; 1994; 3(3):5-8. PubMed ID: 10135113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing managed care market variation in reports of coding accuracy.
Lorence DP; Spink A; Jameson R
Manag Care Q; 2002; 10(4):15-25. PubMed ID: 12561390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond fear. Improving documentation enhances compliance, quality and reimbursement.
Raymond D
Mich Health Hosp; 2000; 36(3):16-7. PubMed ID: 11009905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Concurrent coding provides more accurate data for outcomes and performance reports.
Data Strateg Benchmarks; 1997 Aug; 1(2):25-7, 17. PubMed ID: 10345330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Documentation errors are easy to avoid and correct.
Hosp Case Manag; 2003 Sep; 11(9):140-2. PubMed ID: 12931506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Coders join forces with physicians to improve clinical outcomes.
Noller JR
J AHIMA; 2000 Jan; 71(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 11009649
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. From check-boxes to bytes: one hospital's transition process.
Baranda R; Spangler C; Vukson R
QRC Advis; 1998 Sep; 14(11):5-7. PubMed ID: 10182676
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Think how records might be used before discarding.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2003 Feb; 28(2):22-3. PubMed ID: 12647577
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Organisational factors affecting the quality of hospital clinical coding.
Santos S; Murphy G; Baxter K; Robinson KM
Health Inf Manag; 2008; 37(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 18245862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Patient access to medical records: problems and strategies for inpatient charts.
Nawa H; Ohhara T; Mashiko K; Murakoshi A; Miyamoto J; Numabe H; Kitamura M; Nishino T
Jpn Hosp; 2000 Jul; (19):53-9. PubMed ID: 11142223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
Silfen E
Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer assisted coding quality management.
Servais C
J AHIMA; 1992 Jan; 63(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 10118233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Developing a quality management program for coded data.
Hyde LA
J AHIMA; 1992 Jan; 63(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 10118234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving physician documentation through a clinical documentation management program.
Hicks TA; Gentleman CA
Nurs Adm Q; 2003; 27(4):285-9. PubMed ID: 14649019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
