These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11184208)

  • 1. HCQIA: beyond the data bank--broad immunity in peer review matters.
    Purtell DJ
    Health Care Law Mon; 2000 Aug; ():3-6. PubMed ID: 11184208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 (HCQIA).
    Wecht CH
    Leg Med; 1991; ():269-85. PubMed ID: 1821897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. From HCQIA to the ACA. The evolution of reporting as a quality improvement tool.
    Madison KM
    J Leg Med; 2012 Jan; 33(1):63-92. PubMed ID: 22439708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. National Practitioner Data Bank identifying 'gypsy' physicians.
    Sandrick K
    Trustee; 1993 Mar; 46(3):11, 23. PubMed ID: 10124500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peer review immunity: history, operation, and recent decisions--has HCQIA accomplished its goals?
    Cassidy MA
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 May; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12436737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Federal court's decisions will clarify the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Brown LC; Penner IE
    Health Syst Rev; 1994; 27(4):35-7. PubMed ID: 10135422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months.
    Puryear MA; Politzer RM; Anderson J; Mullan F
    Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10125933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementing the Health Care Quality Improvement Act.
    Pugsley SC
    Leg Med; 1990; ():217-42. PubMed ID: 2130197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The National Practitioner Data Bank and the quality of peer review.
    Hunt HM
    JAMA; 2000 Feb; 283(7):886-7. PubMed ID: 10685710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The National Practitioner Data Bank and the quality of peer review.
    Warren E
    JAMA; 2000 Feb; 283(7):886; author reply 887. PubMed ID: 10685709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The National Practitioner Data Bank and the quality of peer review.
    Frable FL
    JAMA; 2000 Feb; 283(7):886; author reply 887. PubMed ID: 10685708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hospital liability for defamation of character during the peer review process: sticks and stones may break my bones, but words may cost me my job.
    Oliverio J
    Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1991 Sep; (151):7-28. PubMed ID: 10114742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adapting to the National Practitioner Data Bank: perspectives for physicians.
    Gagliano RD; Butler DL
    Med Staff Couns; 1991; 5(4):1-9. PubMed ID: 10114111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Data bank reporting requirements pose vexing issues.
    Tapay N
    Physician Exec; 1992; 18(1):53-4. PubMed ID: 10116425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 and the National Practitioner Data Bank: the controversy over practitioner privacy versus public access.
    Heffernan M
    Bull Med Libr Assoc; 1996 Apr; 84(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 8826636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rural hospitals' experience with the National Practitioner Data Bank.
    Neighbor WE; Baldwin LM; West PA; Hart LG
    Am J Public Health; 1997 Apr; 87(4):663-6. PubMed ID: 9146450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resolving the national practitioner data bank dilemma.
    Brasher P; Sweeris CL
    AAPPO J; 1991; 1(4):27-33. PubMed ID: 10149635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. AOA's voice supporting fair treatment of physicians in quality review process.
    Loniewski EA
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2000 Mar; 100(3):143. PubMed ID: 10763306
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Banking on confidentiality: should consumers be allowed access to the National Practitioner Data Bank?
    Schendel NJ
    J Health Hosp Law; 1994 Oct; 27(10):289-305. PubMed ID: 10137985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The National Practitioner Data Bank: a step toward more effective peer review.
    Hackney VH
    J Health Hosp Law; 1991 Jul; 24(7):201-9, 219. PubMed ID: 10111631
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.