147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11184730)
1. India. New guidelines promise stronger bioethics.
Bagla P
Science; 2000 Nov; 290(5493):919. PubMed ID: 11184730
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Research ethics. NIH examines standards for consent.
Marshall E
Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1688. PubMed ID: 9660706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomedical ethics. HHS plans to overhaul clinical research rules.
Marshall E
Science; 2000 May; 288(5470):1315-6. PubMed ID: 10847836
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Review boards: a system 'in jeopardy'?
Marshall E
Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5371):1830-1. PubMed ID: 9669930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical research. Shutdown at Hopkins sparks a debate.
Marshall E
Science; 2001 Jul; 293(5530):587-9. PubMed ID: 11474076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ethics of private panels comes under scrutiny.
Wadman M
Nature; 1997 May; 387(6632):445. PubMed ID: 9168099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Bioethics activities in India.
Kumar NK
East Mediterr Health J; 2006; 12 Suppl 1():S56-65. PubMed ID: 17037690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical research. India acts on flawed cancer drug trials.
Bagla P
Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5539):2371-3. PubMed ID: 11577215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Shutdown of research at Duke sends a message.
Marshall E
Science; 1999 May; 284(5418):1246. PubMed ID: 10383299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Psychiatric research ethics: an overview of evolving guidelines and current ethical dilemmas in the study of mental illness.
Roberts LW; Roberts B
Biol Psychiatry; 1999 Oct; 46(8):1025-38. PubMed ID: 10536739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Oversight mechanisms for clinical research.
Snyderman R; Holmes EW
Science; 2000 Jan; 287(5453):595-7. PubMed ID: 10691540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical research.
Sugar AM
Science; 2000 Mar; 287(5458):1593. PubMed ID: 10733426
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ethics behind closed doors: do research ethics committees need secrecy?
Ashcroft R; Pfeffer N
BMJ; 2001 May; 322(7297):1294-6. PubMed ID: 11375236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Bioethics. Financial conflicts get more scrutiny in clinical trials.
Agnew B
Science; 2000 Aug; 289(5483):1266-7. PubMed ID: 10979840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. National, independent oversight: reinforcing the safety net for human subjects research.
Mastroianni AC
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):303-9. PubMed ID: 11658185
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Protecting vulnerable research subjects without unduly constraining neuropsychiatric research.
Miller FG; Fins JJ
Arch Gen Psychiatry; 1999 Aug; 56(8):701-2; discussion 703-4. PubMed ID: 10435603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Research in developing countries.
Medical Research Council
Bull Med Ethics; 2005 May; (208):7-11. PubMed ID: 17115492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bioethics and local circumstances.
Mbidde E
Science; 1998 Jan; 279(5348):155. PubMed ID: 9446210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Competence and consent to research: a critique of the recommendations of the National Bioethics Advisory Commission.
Appelbaum PS
Account Res; 1999; 7(2-4):265-76. PubMed ID: 11658181
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New rules on human subjects could end debate in Canada.
Kondro W
Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5369):1521. PubMed ID: 9644014
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
