186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11184998)
1. Toxicology. Panel backs EPA dioxin assessment.
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 Nov; 290(5494):1071. PubMed ID: 11184998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Toxicology. Just how bad is dioxin?
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 Jun; 288(5473):1941-4. PubMed ID: 10877704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Dioxin report faces scientific gauntlet.
Stone R
Science; 1994 Sep; 265(5179):1650. PubMed ID: 8085150
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. EPA dioxin reassessment.
Bradfield CA; Gallo MA; Gasiewicz TA; Greenberg RS; Greenlee WF; Margolick J; Mattison DR; Munson P; Neal RA; Okey AB
Science; 1994 Dec; 266(5191):1628-9. PubMed ID: 7992038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reducing uncertainty in the derivation and application of health guidance values in public health practice. Dioxin as a case study.
De Rosa CT; Pohl HR; Hansen H; Leonard RC; Holler J; Jones D
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1999; 895():348-64. PubMed ID: 10676427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dioxin draft sparks controversy.
Kaiser J
Science; 2000 May; 288(5470):1313-4. PubMed ID: 10847834
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Evaluation (2001) of the EPA dioxin reassessment.
Paustenbach DJ;
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Oct; 36(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 12460755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lessons for living in a chemical world.
Selikoff IJ
Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1984 Dec; 33(6):682-95. PubMed ID: 6394072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. "Why not use it all?" Another view.
Landrigan PJ
Environ Health Perspect; 1999 Nov; 107(11):A546. PubMed ID: 10627174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Significant shortcomings of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's latest draft risk characterization for dioxin-like compounds.
Starr TB
Toxicol Sci; 2001 Nov; 64(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 11606796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. No evidence of dioxin cancer threshold.
Mackie D; Liu J; Loh YS; Thomas V
Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Jul; 111(9):1145-7. PubMed ID: 12842764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dioxin is a promoter blocker, a promoter, and a net anticarcinogen.
Kayajanian G
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1997 Aug; 26(1 Pt 1):134-7. PubMed ID: 9339490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early indicators of response in biologically based risk assessment for nongenotoxic carcinogens.
Gastel JA
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Jun; 33(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 11407940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. EPA launches major dioxin attack.
Sun M
Science; 1984 Jan; 223(4631):34. PubMed ID: 6691131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dioxin review blues.
Environ Health Perspect; 1995 Feb; 103(2):137. PubMed ID: 7737054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. EPA rebuffs challenge to its assessment of dioxin data.
Reichardt T
Nature; 1994 Sep; 371(6495):272. PubMed ID: 8090187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. EPA moves to reassess the risk of dioxin.
Roberts L
Science; 1991 May; 252(5008):911. PubMed ID: 2035022
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Panel slams EPA's dioxin analysis.
Stone R
Science; 1995 May; 268(5214):1124. PubMed ID: 7761824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Basis for a proposed reference dose (RfD) for dioxin of 1-10 pg/kg-day: a weight of evidence evaluation of the human and animal studies.
Greene JF; Hays S; Paustenbach D
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(2):115-59. PubMed ID: 12554432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. EPA moves against mercury and toxic chemicals.
J Environ Monit; 1999 Feb; 1(1):9N. PubMed ID: 11529089
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
