186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11184998)
21. Human Exposure: the key to better risk assessment.
Wakefield J
Environ Health Perspect; 2000 Dec; 108(12):A559-65. PubMed ID: 11133418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Revisions in cancer policy.
Marshall E
Science; 1983 Apr; 220(4592):36-7. PubMed ID: 6828879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Dioxin: dangerous as expected.
Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Aug; 102(8):622. PubMed ID: 7895698
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Indirect exposure assessment at the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
Lorber M
Toxicol Ind Health; 2001 Jun; 17(5-10):145-56. PubMed ID: 12539859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dioxin and advisory board.
Clapp R; Ozonoff D; Silverstone A; Weiss B
Science; 1995 Sep; 269(5228):1204-5. PubMed ID: 7652563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Clearing the air on EPA study of MWI dioxin emissions.
Doucet LG
Health Facil Manage; 1995 Aug; 8(8):78, 80, 82 passim. PubMed ID: 10144447
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [Risks of dioxins on health are still poorly evaluated].
Blond B
Soins Pediatr Pueric; 2000; (197):10. PubMed ID: 11949072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Science.
von Mühlendahl KE
Eur J Pediatr; 1995 Mar; 154(3):241-2. PubMed ID: 7758528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Uncertainty in risk characterization of weak carcinogens.
Yamaguchi N
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1999; 895():338-47. PubMed ID: 10676426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Dioxin pollution and the health risk: long-term studies following the Icmesa disaster].
Pesatori AC; Bertazzi A; Consonni D; Tironi A; Zocchetti C
Epidemiol Prev; 1992 Dec; 14(53):55-64. PubMed ID: 1341669
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Re: analysis of dioxin cancer threshold.
Aylward L; Kirman C; Cher D; Hays S
Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Aug; 111(10):A510. PubMed ID: 12896864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. ISRTP Council comments regarding "a public health and regulatory perspective on risk of dioxin-like compounds". Submitted on behalf of ISRTP Council.
Kolbye AC
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1995 Apr; 21(2):322-4. PubMed ID: 7644721
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A molecular approach to cancer risk.
Stone R
Science; 1995 Apr; 268(5209):356-7. PubMed ID: 7716533
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Consultation on assessment of the health risk of dioxins; re-evaluation of the tolerable daily intake (TDI): executive summary.
Food Addit Contam; 2000 Apr; 17(4):223-40. PubMed ID: 10912238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The perils and promise of modern risk assessment: the example of trichloroethylene.
Kester JE; Clewell HJ
Clin Occup Environ Med; 2004 Aug; 4(3):497-512, vi-vii. PubMed ID: 15325318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Small handbook of dioxin et alias].
Piérard GE; Hermanns JF; Hermanns-Lê T; Piérard-Franchimont C
Rev Med Liege; 1999 Aug; 54(8):655-8. PubMed ID: 10548891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effects of dioxin on reproduction and development.
Yonemoto J
Ind Health; 2000 Jul; 38(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 10943072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. US panel established to coordinate work on endocrine disrupters.
Macilwain C
Nature; 1996 Jul; 382(6587):100. PubMed ID: 8700191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A sensitivity analysis using alternative toxic equivalency factors to estimate U.S. dietary exposures to dioxin-like compounds.
Parvez S; Evans AM; Lorber M; Hawkins BS; Swartout JC; Teuschler LK; Rice GE
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Nov; 67(2):278-84. PubMed ID: 23973911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dioxin exposure and health.
Gochfeld M; Gallo M; Kahn P
N J Med; 1988 Nov; 85(11):907-12. PubMed ID: 3060765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
