145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11185421)
1. Machine learning for survival analysis: a case study on recurrence of prostate cancer.
Zupan B; Demsar J; Kattan MW; Beck JR; Bratko I
Artif Intell Med; 2000 Aug; 20(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 11185421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of censoring on learning Bayesian networks in survival modelling.
Stajduhar I; Dalbelo-Basić B; Bogunović N
Artif Intell Med; 2009 Nov; 47(3):199-217. PubMed ID: 19833488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate Cancer Probability Prediction By Machine Learning Technique.
Jović S; Miljković M; Ivanović M; Šaranović M; Arsić M
Cancer Invest; 2017 Nov; 35(10):647-651. PubMed ID: 29243988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Adapting machine learning techniques to censored time-to-event health record data: A general-purpose approach using inverse probability of censoring weighting.
Vock DM; Wolfson J; Bandyopadhyay S; Adomavicius G; Johnson PE; Vazquez-Benitez G; O'Connor PJ
J Biomed Inform; 2016 Jun; 61():119-31. PubMed ID: 26992568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms for fuzzy classification in survival prediction.
Jiménez F; Sánchez G; Juárez JM
Artif Intell Med; 2014 Mar; 60(3):197-219. PubMed ID: 24525210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Naive Bayesian-based nomogram for prediction of prostate cancer recurrence.
Demsar J; Zupan B; Kattan MW; Beck JR; Bratko I
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():436-41. PubMed ID: 10724923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Learning Bayesian networks from survival data using weighting censored instances.
Stajduhar I; Dalbelo-Basić B
J Biomed Inform; 2010 Aug; 43(4):613-22. PubMed ID: 20332035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Addressing issues associated with evaluating prediction models for survival endpoints based on the concordance statistic.
Wang M; Long Q
Biometrics; 2016 Sep; 72(3):897-906. PubMed ID: 26756274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Machine learning models in breast cancer survival prediction.
Montazeri M; Montazeri M; Montazeri M; Beigzadeh A
Technol Health Care; 2016; 24(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 26409558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correcting for dependent censoring in routine outcome monitoring data by applying the inverse probability censoring weighted estimator.
Willems S; Schat A; van Noorden MS; Fiocco M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Feb; 27(2):323-335. PubMed ID: 26988930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of methods for early-readmission prediction in a high-dimensional heterogeneous covariates and time-to-event outcome framework.
Bussy S; Veil R; Looten V; Burgun A; Gaïffas S; Guilloux A; Ranque B; Jannot AS
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Mar; 19(1):50. PubMed ID: 30841867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Model-agnostic explanations for survival prediction models.
Suresh K; Görg C; Ghosh D
Stat Med; 2024 May; 43(11):2161-2182. PubMed ID: 38530157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Naive Bayes machine learning approach to risk prediction using censored, time-to-event data.
Wolfson J; Bandyopadhyay S; Elidrisi M; Vazquez-Benitez G; Vock DM; Musgrove D; Adomavicius G; Johnson PE; O'Connor PJ
Stat Med; 2015 Sep; 34(21):2941-57. PubMed ID: 25980520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of machine learning to predict early biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted prostatectomy.
Wong NC; Lam C; Patterson L; Shayegan B
BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):51-57. PubMed ID: 29969172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CondiS: A conditional survival distribution-based method for censored data imputation overcoming the hurdle in machine learning-based survival analysis.
Wang Y; Flowers CR; Li Z; Huang X
J Biomed Inform; 2022 Jul; 131():104117. PubMed ID: 35690348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.
Kattan MW; Wheeler TM; Scardino PT
J Clin Oncol; 1999 May; 17(5):1499-507. PubMed ID: 10334537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Machine learning in prognosis of the femoral neck fracture recovery.
Kukar M; Kononenko I; Silvester T
Artif Intell Med; 1996 Oct; 8(5):431-51. PubMed ID: 8955855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of different types of liver diseases using rule based classification model.
Kumar Y; Sahoo G
Technol Health Care; 2013; 21(5):417-32. PubMed ID: 23963359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Machine learning for improved pathological staging of prostate cancer: a performance comparison on a range of classifiers.
Regnier-Coudert O; McCall J; Lothian R; Lam T; McClinton S; N'dow J
Artif Intell Med; 2012 May; 55(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 22206941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative analysis of three risk assessment tools in Australian patients with prostate cancer.
Tamblyn DJ; Chopra S; Yu C; Kattan MW; Pinnock C; Kopsaftis T
BJU Int; 2011 Nov; 108 Suppl 2():51-6. PubMed ID: 22085129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
