These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11185777)

  • 1. Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: assessment of attentional costs and a componential analysis.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Guez J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1461-82. PubMed ID: 11185777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are attentional resources a mediator for sex differences in memory?
    Seçer I; Yılmazoğulları Y
    Int J Psychol; 2016 Apr; 51(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 25451245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Divided attention in younger and older adults: effects of strategy and relatedness on memory performance and secondary task costs.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Guez J; Kreuger S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):520-37. PubMed ID: 15910135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory: further support for an asymmetry.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Guez J; Dori H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1998 Sep; 24(5):1091-104. PubMed ID: 9747524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: the resiliency of retrieval processes.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Perretta JG; Tonev ST
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):609-25. PubMed ID: 10994220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 1. Evidence from divided attention costs.
    Anderson ND; Craik FI; Naveh-Benjamin M
    Psychol Aging; 1998 Sep; 13(3):405-23. PubMed ID: 9793117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.
    Craik FI; Govoni R; Naveh-Benjamin M; Anderson ND
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1996 Jun; 125(2):159-80. PubMed ID: 8683192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of age and a divided attention task presented during encoding and retrieval on memory.
    Park DC; Smith AD; Dudley WN; Lafronza VN
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1989 Nov; 15(6):1185-91. PubMed ID: 2530311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual task demands on encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from healthy adult ageing.
    Logie RH; Della Sala S; MacPherson SE; Cooper J
    Cortex; 2007 Jan; 43(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17334215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fractionation of the component processes underlying successful episodic encoding: a combined fMRI and divided-attention study.
    Uncapher MR; Rugg MD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):240-54. PubMed ID: 18275332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Divided attention reduces resistance to distraction at encoding but not retrieval.
    Weeks JC; Hasher L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 27900585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Value-directed retrieval: The effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval on memory selectivity and retrieval dynamics.
    Murphy DH; Schwartz ST; Castel AD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2024 Jan; 50(1):17-38. PubMed ID: 37326541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Concurrent task effects on memory encoding and retrieval: further support for an asymmetry.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Kilb A; Fisher T
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 16686109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Gavrilescu D; Anderson ND
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Sep; 28(6):965-76. PubMed ID: 11105522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of divided attention on memory for items and their context.
    Troyer AK; Craik FI
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2000 Sep; 54(3):161-71. PubMed ID: 11021036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of divided attention on encoding processes in memory: mapping the locus of interference.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Guez J; Sorek S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2007 Mar; 61(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 17479737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Memory and attention: A double dissociation between memory encoding and memory retrieval.
    Mulligan NW; Spataro P; West JT
    Cognition; 2023 Sep; 238():105509. PubMed ID: 37354786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Toward specifying the attentional demands of recognition memory.
    Hicks JL; Marsh RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1483-98. PubMed ID: 11185778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of divided attention on episodic memory in chronic traumatic brain injury: a function of severity and strategy.
    Mangels JA; Craik FI; Levine B; Schwartz ML; Stuss DT
    Neuropsychologia; 2002; 40(13):2369-85. PubMed ID: 12417466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Brain regions associated with successful and unsuccessful retrieval of verbal episodic memory as revealed by divided attention.
    Fernandes MA; Moscovitch M; Ziegler M; Grady C
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1115-27. PubMed ID: 15817169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.