These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11185777)

  • 21. Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval.
    Kane MJ; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Mar; 26(2):336-58. PubMed ID: 10764100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Conditional automaticity: interference effects on the implicit memory retrieval process.
    Lin J; Meng Y; Lin W
    Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):223-237. PubMed ID: 31302775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Encoding attentional states during visuomotor adaptation.
    Im HY; Bédard P; Song JH
    J Vis; 2015; 15(8):20. PubMed ID: 26114683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Conscious attentional demands of encoding and retrieval from long-term memory.
    Kellogg RT; Cocklin T; Bourne LE
    Am J Psychol; 1982; 95(2):183-98. PubMed ID: 7137417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Attentional limits in memory retrieval.
    Carrier LM; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1339-48. PubMed ID: 8744967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effects of divided attention during encoding and retrieval on amnesic patients' memory performance.
    Cermak LS; Wong BM
    Cortex; 1999 Feb; 35(1):73-87. PubMed ID: 10213535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. What neural correlates underlie successful encoding and retrieval? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study using a divided attention paradigm.
    Kensinger EA; Clarke RJ; Corkin S
    J Neurosci; 2003 Mar; 23(6):2407-15. PubMed ID: 12657700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Conceptual and perceptual processes in prospective remembering: differential influence of attentional resources.
    McGann D; Ellis JA; Milne A
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Oct; 30(7):1021-32. PubMed ID: 12507367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of tobacco craving cues on memory encoding and retrieval in smokers.
    Heishman SJ; Boas ZP; Hager MC; Taylor RC; Singleton EG; Moolchan ET
    Addict Behav; 2006 Jul; 31(7):1116-21. PubMed ID: 16157458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
    Clarke AJ; Butler LT
    Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval: Further data.
    Craik FIM; Eftekhari E; Binns MA
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1263-1277. PubMed ID: 29934748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The testing effect under divided attention.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. State-dependent effects of alcohol on recollective experience, familiarity and awareness of memories.
    Duka T; Weissenborn R; Dienes Z
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2001 Jan; 153(3):295-306. PubMed ID: 11271401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effects of division of attention during encoding and retrieval on age differences in episodic memory.
    Nyberg L; Nilsson LG; Olofsson U; Bäckman L
    Exp Aging Res; 1997; 23(2):137-43. PubMed ID: 9151074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attention and the testing effect.
    Mulligan NW; Picklesimer M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):938-50. PubMed ID: 26618913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The role of semantically related distractors during encoding and retrieval of words in long-term memory.
    Meade ME; Fernandes MA
    Memory; 2016 Jul; 24(6):801-11. PubMed ID: 26277934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of divided attention during verbal learning in young adults following mild traumatic brain injury.
    Blanchet S; Paradis-Giroux AA; Pépin M; McKerral M
    Brain Inj; 2009 Feb; 23(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 19191090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Picture superiority in conceptual memory: dissociative effects of encoding and retrieval tasks.
    Vaidya CJ; Gabrieli JD
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Oct; 28(7):1165-72. PubMed ID: 11126939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Do novel associative word stem completion and cued recall share the same memory retrieval processes?
    Gooding PA; Mayes AR; van Eijk R; Meudell PR; MacDonald FL
    Memory; 1999 May; 7(3):323-43. PubMed ID: 10659081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The attentional demands of encoding and retrieval in younger and older adults: 2. Evidence from secondary task reaction time distributions.
    Anderson ND
    Psychol Aging; 1999 Dec; 14(4):645-55. PubMed ID: 10632151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.