These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11185794)

  • 1. Divided attention during encoding and retrieval: differential control effects?
    Craik FI; Naveh-Benjamin M; Ishaik G; Anderson ND
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Nov; 26(6):1744-9. PubMed ID: 11185794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Divided attention and the encoding effects of retrieval.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Oct; 72(10):2474-2494. PubMed ID: 30975038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register.
    Guez J; Naveh-Benjamin M
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e74447. PubMed ID: 24040249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concurrent task effects on memory encoding and retrieval: further support for an asymmetry.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Kilb A; Fisher T
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Jan; 34(1):90-101. PubMed ID: 16686109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Asymmetry between encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from divided attention and a calibration analysis.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Gavrilescu D; Anderson ND
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Sep; 28(6):965-76. PubMed ID: 11105522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.
    Craik FI; Govoni R; Naveh-Benjamin M; Anderson ND
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1996 Jun; 125(2):159-80. PubMed ID: 8683192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The testing effect under divided attention.
    Buchin ZL; Mulligan NW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1934-1947. PubMed ID: 28504527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of divided attention at encoding and retrieval: Further data.
    Craik FIM; Eftekhari E; Binns MA
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1263-1277. PubMed ID: 29934748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual task demands on encoding and retrieval processes: evidence from healthy adult ageing.
    Logie RH; Della Sala S; MacPherson SE; Cooper J
    Cortex; 2007 Jan; 43(1):159-69. PubMed ID: 17334215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Confabulation in healthy aging is related to poor encoding and retrieval of over-learned information.
    Attali E; Dalla Barba G
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2013; 20(3):339-55. PubMed ID: 22934610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Encoding and retrieval during bimanual rhythmic coordination.
    Shockley K; Turvey MT
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Sep; 31(5):980-90. PubMed ID: 16248746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of divided attention during encoding and retrieval on amnesic patients' memory performance.
    Cermak LS; Wong BM
    Cortex; 1999 Feb; 35(1):73-87. PubMed ID: 10213535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of divided attention at encoding and at retrieval on multidimensional source memory.
    Greene NR; Martin BA; Naveh-Benjamin M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Nov; 47(11):1870-1887. PubMed ID: 34398626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of divided attention on global judgment of learning accuracy.
    Barnes KA; Dougherty MR
    Am J Psychol; 2007; 120(3):347-59. PubMed ID: 17892083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates.
    Meltzer JA; Constable RT
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(2):384-97. PubMed ID: 15627581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: the resiliency of retrieval processes.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Perretta JG; Tonev ST
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):609-25. PubMed ID: 10994220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Are attentional resources a mediator for sex differences in memory?
    Seçer I; Yılmazoğulları Y
    Int J Psychol; 2016 Apr; 51(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 25451245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrieval during learning facilitates subsequent memory encoding.
    Pastötter B; Schicker S; Niedernhuber J; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 21171804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hypermnesia in free recall and cued recall.
    Payne DG; Hembrooke HA; Anastasi JS
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Jan; 21(1):48-62. PubMed ID: 8433647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Study repetition and divided attention: effects of encoding manipulations on collaborative inhibition in group recall.
    Pereira-Pasarin LP; Rajaram S
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Aug; 39(6):968-76. PubMed ID: 21503804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.