511 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11186761)
1. Industry groups praise HCFA's decision not to implement proposed PPS refinements; current system to remain in place for another year.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Aug; 8(16):1-6. PubMed ID: 11186761
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Proposed PPS refinements would boost payments for sickest patients; add no new Medicare money to system.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Apr; 8(8):1-9. PubMed ID: 11009740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. New RUG categories unlikely for first year of SNF PPS.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1997 Oct; 5(22):1-2. PubMed ID: 10175530
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Final rule clarifies coverage issue. Medicare PPS covers five to eight days for the top RUG classifications.
Hawryluk M
Provider; 1999 Oct; 25(10):33-5. PubMed ID: 10747485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. MedPAC to recommend changes to SNF PPS, development of tracking system.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Jan; 7(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 10345946
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Report to HCFA to suggest refinements to RUGS III; permanent changes unlikely this year.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Jan; 7(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 10345945
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Preliminary Abt research points to four possible refinements to RUGS-III; HCFA proposal expected soon.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Mar; 8(6):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 11010422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Why subacute still makes financial sense.
Griffin KM
Contemp Longterm Care; 1998 May; 21(5):39-40. PubMed ID: 10185944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. MedPAC begins work on SNF PPS updates; urges changes to quality monitoring, assessment tools.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Mar; 8(6):1-3. PubMed ID: 11010421
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The good, the bad and the ugly: subacute industry reacts to prospective payment rule.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 May; 6(10):1-4. PubMed ID: 10179897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. MDS schedule for SNF PPS relaxed a bit from demo rules but still demanding.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 May; 6(10):5-8. PubMed ID: 10179899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Intermediaries to begin random medical reviews of SNF PPS bills; memo revisits RUGs deeming issue.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 May; 7(9):1, 2-3. PubMed ID: 10387724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. HCFA's Hoyer says SNFs are attempting to take over hospital business.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1997 Apr; 5(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 10166652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. HCFA again delays 20 percent add-on; providers to receive retroactive payments in July.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 2000 Jun; 8(12):1-2. PubMed ID: 11183220
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Final SNF PPS rule makes few changes to system but offers some important policy clarifications.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Aug; 7(16):1-4. PubMed ID: 10558113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Trade groups seek nontherapy ancillary pass-through under PPS.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Aug; 6(17):1-4. PubMed ID: 10182871
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. PPS rates should be adequate for most SNFs, says former HCFA project officer; industry groups dispute findings.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1999 Jun; 7(11):1-5. PubMed ID: 10538074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Skilled nursing facility PPS rules released.
Hosp Outlook; 1998 May; 1(5):5. PubMed ID: 10185366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Raising red flags: likely areas for focused medical review under PPS.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Jun; 6(12):3-4. PubMed ID: 10180809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Description of RUG III patient classification system in PPS rule incomplete, possibly misleading.
Natl Rep Subacute Care; 1998 Jun; 6(11):4-7. PubMed ID: 10180329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]