135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11187570)
1. Combined test procedures in the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
Knapp G; Hartung J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():34-8. PubMed ID: 11187570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On tests of the overall treatment effect in meta-analysis with normally distributed responses.
Hartung J; Knapp G
Stat Med; 2001 Jun; 20(12):1771-82. PubMed ID: 11406840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate.
Knapp G; Hartung J
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2693-710. PubMed ID: 12939780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of summary survival curve data.
Arends LR; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4381-96. PubMed ID: 18465839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update.
DerSimonian R; Kacker R
Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 16807131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [A Meta-analysis in multi-center random controlled clinical trials].
Ou AH; Lao YR; Li XQ; Huang Y; He YT; Huang PX
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 26(4):290-3. PubMed ID: 15941541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results.
Schmidt FL; Oh IS; Hayes TL
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):97-128. PubMed ID: 18001516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of three different models for estimating relative risk in meta-analysis of clinical trials under unobserved heterogeneity.
Kuhnert R; Böhning D
Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(11):2277-96. PubMed ID: 16991109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Testing overall and moderator effects in random effects meta-regression.
Huizenga HM; Visser I; Dolan CV
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Feb; 64(Pt 1):1-19. PubMed ID: 21506942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A test for publication bias in meta-analysis with sparse binary data.
Schwarzer G; Antes G; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):721-33. PubMed ID: 16755545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of statistical methods for meta-analysis.
Brockwell SE; Gordon IR
Stat Med; 2001 Mar; 20(6):825-40. PubMed ID: 11252006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. On the utility of the Dirichlet distribution for meta-analysis of clinical studies.
Sankoh AJ; Al-Osh M; Huque MF
J Biopharm Stat; 1999 May; 9(2):289-306. PubMed ID: 10379695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Applying the law of iterated logarithm to control type I error in cumulative meta-analysis of binary outcomes.
Hu M; Cappelleri JC; Lan KK
Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 17848494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Meta-analysis as a tool for gaining knowledge].
Koch A; Ziegler S
Med Klin (Munich); 2000 May; 95(1 Spec No):83-90. PubMed ID: 10851854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods].
Twardella D; Bruckner T; Blettner M
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15672306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tests for homogeneity of the risk difference when data are sparse.
Lipsitz SR; Dear KB; Laird NM; Molenberghs G
Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):148-60. PubMed ID: 9544513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Statistical analysis of joint short-term and long-term survival in resuscitation research.
Babbs CF
Resuscitation; 2007 Nov; 75(2):323-31. PubMed ID: 17583410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Practical methodology of meta-analysis of individual patient data using a survival outcome.
Katsahian S; Latouche A; Mary JY; Chevret S; Porcher R
Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Mar; 29(2):220-30. PubMed ID: 17884735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
