These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11187581)

  • 1. Meta-analysis: different methods--different conclusions?
    Böckenhoff A; Hartung J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():39-43. PubMed ID: 11187581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A note on variance estimation in random effects meta-regression.
    Sidik K; Jonkman JN
    J Biopharm Stat; 2005; 15(5):823-38. PubMed ID: 16078388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Imputing variance estimates do not alter the conclusions of a meta-analysis with continuous outcomes: a case study of changes in renal function after living kidney donation.
    Thiessen Philbrook H; Barrowman N; Garg AX
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 60(3):228-40. PubMed ID: 17292016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analysis of individual patient data versus aggregate data from longitudinal clinical trials.
    Jones AP; Riley RD; Williamson PR; Whitehead A
    Clin Trials; 2009 Feb; 6(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 19254930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combined test procedures in the meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
    Knapp G; Hartung J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():34-8. PubMed ID: 11187570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fixed- versus random-effects models in meta-analysis: model properties and an empirical comparison of differences in results.
    Schmidt FL; Oh IS; Hayes TL
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2009 Feb; 62(Pt 1):97-128. PubMed ID: 18001516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of summary survival curve data.
    Arends LR; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
    Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4381-96. PubMed ID: 18465839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating equations for association structures.
    Yan J; Fine J
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):859-74; discussion 875-7,879-80. PubMed ID: 15027075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The relative benefits of meta-analysis conducted with individual participant data versus aggregated data.
    Cooper H; Patall EA
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Jun; 14(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 19485627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Applying the law of iterated logarithm to control type I error in cumulative meta-analysis of binary outcomes.
    Hu M; Cappelleri JC; Lan KK
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 17848494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficient simulation of P values for linkage analysis.
    Song KK; Weeks DE; Sobel E; Feingold E
    Genet Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 26(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 14748008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simulation study comparing properties of heterogeneity measures in meta-analyses.
    Mittlböck M; Heinzl H
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4321-33. PubMed ID: 16991104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
    Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey.
    Ioannidis JP; Trikalinos TA
    CMAJ; 2007 Apr; 176(8):1091-6. PubMed ID: 17420491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of approximating or ignoring within-study covariances in multivariate meta-analyses.
    Ishak KJ; Platt RW; Joseph L; Hanley JA
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(5):670-86. PubMed ID: 17492826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Statistical analysis of community-based studies -- presentation and comparison of possible solutions with reference to statistical meta-analytic methods].
    Twardella D; Bruckner T; Blettner M
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 15672306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
    Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hypothesis tests for population heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Viechtbauer W
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2007 May; 60(Pt 1):29-60. PubMed ID: 17535578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Generalized least squares for the synthesis of correlated information.
    Berrington A; Cox DR
    Biostatistics; 2003 Jul; 4(3):423-31. PubMed ID: 12925509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Repeated-measures modeling improved comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis of dependent studies.
    Siadaty MS; Philbrick JT; Heim SW; Schectman JM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 57(7):698-711. PubMed ID: 15358397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.