These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11187599)

  • 1. Availability and accuracy of electronic patient data for medical practice assessment.
    Prins H; Kruisinga FH; Büller HA; Zwetsloot-Schonk JH
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2000; 77():484-8. PubMed ID: 11187599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Availability and usability of data for medical practice assessment.
    Prins H; Kruisinga FH; Büller HA; Zwetsloot-Schonk JH
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2002 Apr; 14(2):127-37. PubMed ID: 11954682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Factors influencing the quality of medical documentation when a paper-based medical records system is replaced with an electronic medical records system: an Iranian case study.
    Pourasghar F; Malekafzali H; Koch S; Fors U
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 18828939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of computerized outpatient diagnoses in a Veterans Affairs general medicine clinic.
    Szeto HC; Coleman RK; Gholami P; Hoffman BB; Goldstein MK
    Am J Manag Care; 2002 Jan; 8(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 11814171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The electronic patient records of the Hannover Medical School.
    Porth AJ; Niehoff C; Matthies HK
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 68():801-4. PubMed ID: 10725006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paper versus computer: feasibility of an electronic medical record in general pediatrics.
    Roukema J; Los RK; Bleeker SE; van Ginneken AM; van der Lei J; Moll HA
    Pediatrics; 2006 Jan; 117(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16396855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
    Silfen E
    Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Lack of agreement in pediatric emergency department discharge diagnoses from clinical and administrative data sources.
    Gorelick MH; Knight S; Alessandrini EA; Stanley RM; Chamberlain JM; Kuppermann N; Alpern ER;
    Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Jul; 14(7):646-52. PubMed ID: 17554009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Data quality probes--a synergistic method for quality monitoring of electronic medical record data accuracy and healthcare provision.
    Brown PJ; Harwood J; Brantigan P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):1116-9. PubMed ID: 11604902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consequences of impaired data quality on information retrieval in electronic patient records.
    Mikkelsen G; Aasly J
    Int J Med Inform; 2005 Jun; 74(5):387-94. PubMed ID: 15893261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hospital chart review provided more accurate comorbidity information than data from a general practitioner survey or an administrative database.
    Preen DB; Holman CD; Lawrence DM; Baynham NJ; Semmens JB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1295-304. PubMed ID: 15617956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Surgical information systems as instruments in quality assurance].
    Bülzebruck H; Dienemann H; Vogt-Moykopf I
    Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():240-5. PubMed ID: 9574136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The potential of electronic medical record systems to support quality improvement work and research in Norwegian general practice.
    Treweek S
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2003 Jun; 3(1):10. PubMed ID: 12793909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the possibility to classify patients according to cholesterol guideline screening criteria using routinely recorded electronic patient record data.
    Van Wyk JT; Van Wijk MA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 93():39-46. PubMed ID: 15058412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliable personal health records.
    Van Deursen T; Koster P; Petković M
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():484-9. PubMed ID: 18487778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Quality assurance in heart surgery: 8 years experience with a "feedback-control" system in Heidelberg].
    Vahl CF; Meinzer P; Thomas G; Osswald BR; Hagl S
    Herz; 1996 Dec; 21(6):371-82. PubMed ID: 9081906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Can adverse events be extracted from electronic anesthesia records?
    Powell T
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; ():1083. PubMed ID: 18694181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Quality of data transfer in perinatal data -- experience of a centre].
    Stein W; Kaplan L; Woernle F; Kühnert M; Schmidt S
    Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2006 Apr; 210(2):60-6. PubMed ID: 16565940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Taking a quality assurance program from paper to electronic health records: one dental school's experience.
    Filker PJ; Muckey EJ; Kelner SM; Kodish-Stav J
    J Dent Educ; 2009 Sep; 73(9):1095-101. PubMed ID: 19734251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of scanning and eliminating paper-based medical records on hospital physicians' clinical work practice.
    Laerum H; Karlsen TH; Faxvaag A
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2003; 10(6):588-95. PubMed ID: 12925550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.