These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Benchmarks. Hernia repair best performers. OR Manager; 1999 Nov; 15(11):14. PubMed ID: 10662214 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Relative value units: from A to Z, Part 4. Glass KP; Piland NF J Med Pract Manage; 2002; 18(3):120-3. PubMed ID: 12534251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Standardisation of timings for general surgical operations--its applications in hospital planning and management. Kainikkara PG J Acad Hosp Adm; 1992 Jan; 4(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 10130921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Improving Pap test turnaround time using external benchmark data and engineering process improvement tools. Persoon TJ; Zaleski MS; Cohen MB Am J Clin Pathol; 2002 Oct; 118(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 12375639 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Improving the process for preop antibiotics. OR Manager; 2001 Jan; 17(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 11209190 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. A survey of quality indicator use in the clinical laboratory. Preston LJ Clin Lab Sci; 2008; 21(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18335858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Optimized delivery radiological reports: applying Six Sigma methodology to a radiology department. Cavagna E; Berletti R; Schiavon F; Scarsi B; Barbato G Radiol Med; 2003 Mar; 105(3):205-14. PubMed ID: 12835644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Improving group practice performance with benchmarking. Witt MJ Healthc Financ Manage; 2001 Feb; 55(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 11271446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation]. Giraldes Mdo R Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Identifying best practice through benchmarking and outcome measurement. Lanier L Insight; 2004; 29(2):12-4. PubMed ID: 15709351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Practice re-engineering through the use of benchmarks: Part 1. Witt MJ J Med Pract Manage; 2002; 17(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 11873445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Hazards of benchmarking complications with the National Trauma Data Bank: numerators in search of denominators. Kardooni S; Haut ER; Chang DC; Pierce CA; Efron DT; Haider AH; Pronovost PJ; Cornwell EE J Trauma; 2008 Feb; 64(2):273-7; discussion 277-9. PubMed ID: 18301186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How did the new tracer process go? OR Manager; 2004 Nov; 20(11):20-1. PubMed ID: 15581250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart. Benedetto AR Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Taking to the road for PI: use the balance scorecard to find your way. Behrens L; Oldenkamp M Lippincotts Case Manag; 2000; 5(4):148-56. PubMed ID: 16397990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Benchmarking and quality in residential and nursing homes: lessons from the US. Mor V; Angelelli J; Gifford D; Morris J; Moore T Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2003 Mar; 18(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 12642896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]