131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11188395)
1. [Criticism of mass screening for breast cancer and cervix cancer].
Zahl PH
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Nov; 120(29):3602. PubMed ID: 11188395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [Different motives behind criticism of mass screening for cancer of the breast and cervix uteri].
Thoresen SO
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Sep; 120(23):2807-9. PubMed ID: 11107931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening program serves fraction of those eligible.
Finkelstein JB
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Feb; 99(4):270-1. PubMed ID: 17312302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast and cervical carcinoma screening services: physicians' perceptions of need.
Scott-Conner CE; Christie DW; McGehee R; Anglin BL; Heatherington R
J Miss State Med Assoc; 1996 Nov; 37(11):809-15. PubMed ID: 8961682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A combined screening program for the detection of carcinoma of the cervix and carcinoma of the breast.
Dowdy AH; Lagasse LD; Sperling L; Barker WF; Zeldis LJ; Longmire WP; Cooper PH
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1970 Jul; 131(1):93-8. PubMed ID: 5419968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Tasks of cancer prevention examinations in the woman].
Stoll P
Fortschr Med; 1974 Mar; 92(9):353-7. PubMed ID: 4819502
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Improving utilization of breast and cervical cancer screening.
Barmus B
J Natl Med Assoc; 1996 Apr; 88(4):201. PubMed ID: 8648653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Introduction. The diffusion of screening programmes in Italy: 2007.
Zappa M; Naldoni C; Paci E; Segnan N; Vettorazzi C; Federici A
Epidemiol Prev; 2009; 33(3 Suppl 2):7-10. PubMed ID: 19776483
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Breast & cervical cancer report from ADH.
J Ark Med Soc; 1998 Jan; 94(8):346-7. PubMed ID: 9448359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Wisconsin Women's Cancer Control Program: 1999 update.
Johnson G; Schell W; Park S; Shalkham J; Stitt J; Remington P
WMJ; 1999; 98(4):19-21. PubMed ID: 10555471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Is the benefit of organized mass screening for cervix cancer and breast cancer in Norway scientifically justified?].
Zahl PH
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2000 Jun; 120(17):2002-5. PubMed ID: 11008534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Detection of "risk groups" in the early diagnosis of malignant tumors].
Levshin VF; Zaridze DG
Vopr Onkol; 1990; 36(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 2330680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Breast and gynaecological screening.
Last PA
Practitioner; 1981 May; 225(1355):633-40. PubMed ID: 7291117
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Simultaneous screening of cancers of the breast, cervix, colon and rectum. The Isère experience].
Exbrayat C; Garnier A; Bolla M; Winckel P; Salicru B; Marron J; Faure H; Menegoz F; Billette de Villemeur A
Bull Cancer; 1996 Aug; 83(8):641-8. PubMed ID: 8869044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dilemmas in care of the elderly.
Can Fam Physician; 1996 Jul; 42():1305. PubMed ID: 8754699
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Stat bite: Cancer screening for women.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Feb; 99(4):271. PubMed ID: 17312303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. What is the right cancer screening rate?
Harris R
Ann Intern Med; 2000 May; 132(9):732-4. PubMed ID: 10787367
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Organized mammographic screening programmes. A benign or malignant neglect?
Mitchell H
Med J Aust; 1987 Jan; 146(2):87-90. PubMed ID: 3796427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening for life: helping Delaware women receive lifesaving services.
Lutz R
Del Med J; 1999 Sep; 71(9):383-4. PubMed ID: 10584438
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Recommendations on cancer screening in the European Union].
Micksche M; Lynge E; Diehl V; Estape J; Vertio H; Faivre J; Papamichail M; Daly PA; Veronesi U; Dicato M; Kroes R; Limbert E; Holm LE; Vandenbroucke A; Davies T;
Bull Cancer; 2001 Jul; 88(7):687-92. PubMed ID: 11495822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
