These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11188793)

  • 1. Pseudoaccomodation and oscillopsia in pseudophakia.
    Lauer KB; Herzig DV
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2000 Dec; 26(12):1700-1. PubMed ID: 11188793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-order aberrations in pseudophakia with different IOLs.
    Cheng AC; Lam DS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 May; 31(5):867; author reply 867-8. PubMed ID: 15975439
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Aphakic retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens (IOL) pseudophakic accommodation.
    Galvis V; Tello A; Carreño NI; Revelo ML
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 251(10):2483-4. PubMed ID: 23733035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of an open-field autorefractor's ability to measure refraction and hence potential to assess objective accommodation in pseudophakes.
    Wolffsohn JS; Davies LN; Naroo SA; Buckhurst PJ; Gibson GA; Gupta N; Craig JP; Shah S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2011 Apr; 95(4):498-501. PubMed ID: 20657018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conjoined intraocular lenses: An unusual IOL-related complication.
    Ashok Kumar D; Agarwal A; Agarwal A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2015 Sep; 41(9):2020-1. PubMed ID: 26459717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Response to: position-dependent accommodative shift of retropupillary fixated iris-claw lenses.
    Sekundo W
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 251(10):2485-6. PubMed ID: 23740518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of axis misalignment of toric intraocular lenses on refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.
    Jin H; Limberger IJ; Ehmer A; Guo H; Auffarth GU
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Dec; 36(12):2061-72. PubMed ID: 21111308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Further assessment of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision.
    Xiao J; Li S; Jiang C
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 May; 39(5):816-7. PubMed ID: 23608583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal target refraction for implantation of monofocal intraocular lenses.
    Harris WF
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2012 Feb; 90(1):e75-6; author reply e75. PubMed ID: 21624104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of wavefront analysis between monofocal and multifocal posterior chamber implants.
    Hida WT; Kara-Junior NJ; Nakano CT
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2008 Apr; 43(2):248-9. PubMed ID: 18347639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functions of the capsular tension ring.
    Sun R
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Jan; 33(1):4. PubMed ID: 17189776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reply: Further assessment of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision.
    Beiko GH
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 May; 39(5):817. PubMed ID: 23608585
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In-the-bag intraocular lens exchange 13 years after refractive lens extraction.
    Roelofs K; Rudnisky C
    Can J Ophthalmol; 2016 Dec; 51(6):e161-e163. PubMed ID: 27938971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Potential source of pseudoaccomodation in young pseudophakic patients.
    Patel S; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2001 Jan; 27(1):9-10. PubMed ID: 11253768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes of the accommodative amplitude and the anterior chamber depth after implantation of an accommodative intraocular lens.
    Schneider H; Stachs O; Göbel K; Guthoff R
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2006 Mar; 244(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 16133019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparing visual function of accommodating IOLs versus mini-monovision with a nonaccommodating monofocal IOL.
    Pepose JS
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):969-70. PubMed ID: 23688902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lack of statistical power and refractive outcomes.
    Aristodemou P; Cartwright NK; Johnston R
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Dec; 51(12):6892-3. PubMed ID: 21123775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reply: comparing visual function of accommodating IOLs versus mini-monovision with a nonaccommodating monofocal IOL.
    Beiko G
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):970. PubMed ID: 23688903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Refractive power of crystalline lens implants. 500 case reports].
    Geerts D; Galand A
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1984-1985; 212():97-102. PubMed ID: 6545883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The roles of corneal power and anterior chamber depth on the accommodation in aphakic intraocular lenses.
    Lin JT
    J Refract Surg; 2005; 21(6):765-6. PubMed ID: 16329375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.