193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11189458)
1. Getting 360 degrees feedback right.
Peiperl MA
Harv Bus Rev; 2001 Jan; 79(1):142-7, 177. PubMed ID: 11189458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance appraisal: can we 'manage' away the curse?
Lee C
Radiol Manage; 1997; 19(2):46-54. PubMed ID: 10166747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multiple rater performance appraisals: solutions for hospital personnel.
Boissoneau RA; Edwards MR
Hosp Health Serv Adm; 1985; 30(2):54-66. PubMed ID: 10270712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Conducting effective performance appraisals.
Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2001; 15(5):348-52. PubMed ID: 11683150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The state of the art in evaluating the performance of assistant and associate deans as seen by deans and assistant and associate deans.
Dunning DG; Durham TM; Aksu MN; Lange BM
J Dent Educ; 2008 Apr; 72(4):458-71. PubMed ID: 18381852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The state of the art in evaluating the performance of department chairs and division heads.
Dunning DG; Durham TM; Aksu MN; Lange BM
J Dent Educ; 2007 Apr; 71(4):467-79. PubMed ID: 17468307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.
Benedetto AR
Radiol Manage; 2003; 25(2):40-53. PubMed ID: 12800564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A better way to deliver bad news.
Manzoni JF
Harv Bus Rev; 2002 Sep; 80(9):114-9, 126. PubMed ID: 12227144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strategic issues in performance appraisal: theory and practice.
Fombrun CJ; Laud RL
Personnel; 1983; 60(6):23-31. PubMed ID: 10264837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance appraisal: helpful hints for the busy medical practice manager.
Bolon DS
J Med Pract Manage; 2006; 21(4):216-8. PubMed ID: 16562524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Managing performance with peer appraisal.
Fernsebner B
OR Manager; 1992 Jan; 8(1):20-1. PubMed ID: 10116043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Does multisource feedback influence performance appraisal satisfaction?
Dupee JM; Ernst NP; Caslin KE
Nurs Manage; 2011 Mar; 42(3):12-6. PubMed ID: 21364373
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementing peer review: guidelines for managers and staff.
Davis KK; Capozzoli J; Parks J
Nurs Adm Q; 2009; 33(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 19546745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. External feedback in general practice: a focus group study of trained peer reviewers of significant event analyses.
McKay J; Pope L; Bowie P; Lough M
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Feb; 15(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 19239594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fear of feedback.
Jackman JM; Strober MH
Harv Bus Rev; 2003 Apr; 81(4):101-7, 124. PubMed ID: 12687924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new game plan for C players.
Axelrod B; Handfield-Jones H; Michaels E
Harv Bus Rev; 2002 Jan; 80(1):80-8, 126. PubMed ID: 12964469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Practical governance: CEO performance appraisal.
Tyler JL; Biggs EL
Trustee; 2001 May; 54(5):18-21. PubMed ID: 11373817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reinforcing staff performance in residential facilities: a survey of common managerial practices.
Green CW; Reid DH
Ment Retard; 1991 Aug; 29(4):195-200. PubMed ID: 1921728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance appraisal in the age of TQM.
Marr TJ; Kusy M
Physician Exec; 1993; 19(5):15-7. PubMed ID: 10161025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Giving and receiving constructive feedback: a staff training tool.
Hills L
J Med Pract Manage; 2010; 25(6):356-9. PubMed ID: 20695247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
