BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11189539)

  • 1. Investigating the efficacy of a nonpowered pressure-reducing therapeutic mattress: a retrospective multi-site study.
    Fontaine R
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Sep; 46(9):34-43. PubMed ID: 11189539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of air-fluidized therapy with other support surfaces used to treat pressure ulcers in nursing home residents.
    Ochs RF; Horn SD; van Rijswijk L; Pietsch C; Smout RJ
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Feb; 51(2):38-68. PubMed ID: 15699554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interface pressure, wound healing, and satisfaction in the evaluation of a non-powered fluid mattress.
    Wells JA; Karr D
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1998 Feb; 44(2):38-42, 44-6, 48 passim. PubMed ID: 9526420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Constant force technology" versus low-air-loss therapy in the treatment of pressure ulcers.
    Branom R; Rappl LM
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2001 Sep; 47(9):38-46. PubMed ID: 11889743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Patient, wound, and treatment characteristics associated with healing in pressure ulcers.
    Kramer JD; Kearney M
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 11061706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective study evaluating the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH Tool) to assess stage II, stage III, and stage IV pressure ulcers.
    Günes UY
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 May; 55(5):48-52. PubMed ID: 19471048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early versus late initiation of negative pressure wound therapy: examining the impact on home care length of stay.
    Baharestani MM; Houliston-Otto DB; Barnes S
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2008 Nov; 54(11):48-53. PubMed ID: 19037137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The National Pressure Ulcer Long-Term Care Study: outcomes of pressure ulcer treatments in long-term care.
    Bergstrom N; Horn SD; Smout RJ; Bender SA; Ferguson ML; Taler G; Sauer AC; Sharkey SS; Voss AC
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2005 Oct; 53(10):1721-9. PubMed ID: 16181171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrical stimulation therapy increases rate of healing of pressure ulcers in community-dwelling people with spinal cord injury.
    Houghton PE; Campbell KE; Fraser CH; Harris C; Keast DH; Potter PJ; Hayes KC; Woodbury MG
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2010 May; 91(5):669-78. PubMed ID: 20434602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stage 2 pressure ulcer healing in nursing homes.
    Bergstrom N; Smout R; Horn S; Spector W; Hartz A; Limcangco MR
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2008 Jul; 56(7):1252-8. PubMed ID: 18482291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reporting outcomes for stage IV pressure ulcer healing: a proposal.
    Brown GS
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2000; 13(6):277-83. PubMed ID: 12669674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of a low-air-loss mattress system in the treatment of patients with pressure ulcers.
    Charles MA; Oldenbrook J; Catton C
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Jun; 41(5):46-8, 50, 52. PubMed ID: 7612140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of non-thermal pulsed electromagnetic energy on wound healing of pressure ulcers in spinal cord-injured patients: a randomized, double-blind study.
    Salzberg CA; Cooper-Vastola SA; Perez F; Viehbeck MG; Byrne DW
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1995 Apr; 41(3):42-4, 46, 48 passim. PubMed ID: 7546114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Lateral rotation mattresses for wound healing.
    Anderson C; Rappl L
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2004 Apr; 50(4):50-4, 56, 58 passim. PubMed ID: 15259801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The clinical and cost effectiveness of externally applied negative pressure wound therapy in the treatment of wounds in home healthcare Medicare patients.
    Philbeck TE; Whittington KT; Millsap MH; Briones RB; Wight DG; Schroeder WJ
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 1999 Nov; 45(11):41-50. PubMed ID: 10687657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. National pressure ulcer prevalence survey.
    Meehan M
    Adv Wound Care; 1994 May; 7(3):27-30, 34, 36-8. PubMed ID: 7827737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preliminary use of a hydrogel containing enzymes in the treatment of stage II and stage III pressure ulcers.
    Parnell LK; Ciufi B; Gokoo CF
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2005 Aug; 51(8):50-60. PubMed ID: 16234576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The prevalence, management, equipment provision and outcome for patients with pressure ulceration identified in a wound care survey within one English health care district.
    Vowden KR; Vowden P
    J Tissue Viability; 2009 Feb; 18(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 19097794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy for postsurgical patients in long-term acute care.
    de Leon JM; Barnes S; Nagel M; Fudge M; Lucius A; Garcia B
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 Mar; 22(3):122-7. PubMed ID: 19247013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Prevention of pressure ulcers: retrospective study regarding the effectiveness of an alternate pressure device].
    Rasero L; Fabbri C; Cantasano L; Lotti T; Pucci T; Veratti M; Rossi M
    Prof Inferm; 2007; 60(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 18289496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.