These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11189827)

  • 21. Tobacco industry attempts to frame smoking as a 'disability' under the 1990 Americans with Disabilities Act.
    van der Eijk Y; Glantz SA
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188188. PubMed ID: 29176829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Boards of Health as venues for clean indoor air policy making.
    Dearlove JV; Glantz SA
    Am J Public Health; 2002 Feb; 92(2):257-65. PubMed ID: 11818302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An analysis of lobbying activity on tobacco issues in the Wisconsin legislature.
    Ahrens D; Jones N; Pfister K; Remington PL
    WMJ; 2011 Apr; 110(2):74-7. PubMed ID: 21560561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tobacco industry interference with tobacco control policies in Poland: legal aspects and industry practices.
    Balwicki Ł; Stokłosa M; Balwicka-Szczyrba M; Tomczak W
    Tob Control; 2016 Sep; 25(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 26418616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Tobacco industry efforts to defeat the occupational safety and health administration indoor air quality rule.
    Bryan-Jones K; Bero LA
    Am J Public Health; 2003 Apr; 93(4):585-92. PubMed ID: 12660202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Tobacco control in Namibia: the importance of government capacity, media coverage and industry interference.
    Tam J; van Walbeek C
    Tob Control; 2014 Nov; 23(6):518-23. PubMed ID: 23788605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Turning free speech into corporate speech: Philip Morris' efforts to influence U.S. and European journalists regarding the U.S. EPA report on secondhand smoke.
    Muggli ME; Hurt RD; Becker LB
    Prev Med; 2004 Sep; 39(3):568-80. PubMed ID: 15313097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cannabis industry lobbying in the Colorado state legislature in fiscal years 2010-2021.
    Rotering T; Apollonio DE
    Int J Drug Policy; 2022 Apr; 102():103585. PubMed ID: 35085854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. German tobacco industry's successful efforts to maintain scientific and political respectability to prevent regulation of secondhand smoke.
    Bornhäuser A; McCarthy J; Glantz SA
    Tob Control; 2006 Apr; 15(2):e1. PubMed ID: 16565444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Duluth clean indoor air ordinance: problems and success in fighting the tobacco industry at the local level in the 21st century.
    Tsoukalas T; Glantz SA
    Am J Public Health; 2003 Aug; 93(8):1214-21. PubMed ID: 12893598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Oklahoma tobacco policy-making.
    Givel M
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 2005 Mar; 98(3):89-94. PubMed ID: 15822722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Tobacco industry success in preventing regulation of secondhand smoke in Latin America: the "Latin Project".
    Barnoya J; Glantz S
    Tob Control; 2002 Dec; 11(4):305-14. PubMed ID: 12432156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry.
    Tong EK; England L; Glantz SA
    Pediatrics; 2005 Mar; 115(3):e356-66. PubMed ID: 15741361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Tobacco industry strategies to undermine the 8th World Conference on Tobacco or Health.
    Muggli ME; Hurt RD
    Tob Control; 2003 Jun; 12(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 12773731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The implementation and enforcement of tobacco control laws: policy implications for activists and the industry.
    Jacobson PD; Wasserman J
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1999 Jun; 24(3):567-98. PubMed ID: 10386327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Consent and counter-mobilization: the case of the national smokers alliance.
    Givel M
    J Health Commun; 2007 Jun; 12(4):339-57. PubMed ID: 17558787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Where there's smoke there's money: tobacco industry campaign contributions and U.S. Congressional voting.
    Luke DA; Krauss M
    Am J Prev Med; 2004 Dec; 27(5):363-72. PubMed ID: 15556735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tobacco control and direct democracy in Dade County, Florida: future implications for health advocates.
    Givel MS; Glantz SA
    J Public Health Policy; 2000; 21(3):268-95. PubMed ID: 11021043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implications of the tobacco industry documents for public health and policy.
    Bero L
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2003; 24():267-88. PubMed ID: 12415145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Development and destruction of the first state funded anti-smoking campaign in the USA.
    Tsoukalas TH; Glantz SA
    Tob Control; 2003 Jun; 12(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 12773734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.