These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11189929)

  • 21. Biomechanical Analysis of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Constructs with Various Fixation Options: Based on a Validated Finite Element Model.
    Zhang Z; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Sun Y; Liu W
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Jun; 114():e1120-e1129. PubMed ID: 29609081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
    Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. In vitro stabilizing effect of a transforaminal compared with two posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages.
    Kettler A; Schmoelz W; Kast E; Gottwald M; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Nov; 30(22):E665-70. PubMed ID: 16284577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using two standard cylindrical threaded cages, a single mega-cage, or dual nested cages: a biomechanical comparison.
    Murakami H; Horton WC; Kawahara N; Tomita K; Hutton WC
    J Orthop Sci; 2001; 6(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 11479764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative biomechanical investigation of a modular dynamic lumbar stabilization system and the Dynesys system.
    Gédet P; Haschtmann D; Thistlethwaite PA; Ferguson SJ
    Eur Spine J; 2009 Oct; 18(10):1504-11. PubMed ID: 19565278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of cage height on the flexibility and load sharing of lumbar spine after lumbar interbody fusion with unilateral and bilateral instrumentation: a biomechanical study.
    Du L; Sun XJ; Zhou TJ; Li YC; Chen C; Zhao CQ; Zhang K; Zhao J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Nov; 18(1):474. PubMed ID: 29162074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous fusion device and bilateral pedicle screw system as additional fixation for lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
    Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Lee WE; Vrionis FD
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Feb; 30(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 25577548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intraoperative loosening of Bagby and Kuslich cages during anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Hodges SD; Humphreys SC; Eck JC; Murphy RB
    J Spinal Disord; 2000 Dec; 13(6):535-7. PubMed ID: 11132987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Less invasive posterior fixation method following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical analysis.
    Slucky AV; Brodke DS; Bachus KN; Droge JA; Braun JT
    Spine J; 2006; 6(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 16413452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Biomechanical advantages of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar interbody fusion compared with freehand technique in a prospective randomized controlled trial-perspective for patient-specific finite element analysis.
    Kim HJ; Kang KT; Park SC; Kwon OH; Son J; Chang BS; Lee CK; Yeom JS; Lenke LG
    Spine J; 2017 May; 17(5):671-680. PubMed ID: 27867080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
    Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Primary stability of 2 PLIF (posterior lumbar interbody fusion)--a biomechanical in vitro comparison].
    Pitzen T; Caspar W; Matthis D; Müller-Storz H; König J; Georg T; Wurm EM; Steudel WI
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1999; 137(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 10441825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
    Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
    Rohlmann A; Burra NK; Zander T; Bergmann G
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1223-31. PubMed ID: 17206401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Would an anatomically shaped lumbar interbody cage provide better stability? An in vitro cadaveric biomechanical evaluation.
    Tsitsopoulos PP; Serhan H; Voronov LI; Carandang G; Havey RM; Ghanayem AJ; Patwardhan AG
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Dec; 25(8):E240-4. PubMed ID: 22362111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
    Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. New interspinous implant evaluation using an in vitro biomechanical study combined with a finite-element analysis.
    Lafage V; Gangnet N; Sénégas J; Lavaste F; Skalli W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(16):1706-13. PubMed ID: 17632390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone lumbar polyether-ether-ketone interbody cage with integrated screws.
    Kornblum MB; Turner AW; Cornwall GB; Zatushevsky MA; Phillips FM
    Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 23295035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Revision strategies for salvaging or improving failed cylindrical cages.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Lee GA; Orbegoso CM; Haggerty CJ; Fedder IL; Griffith SL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Oct; 24(20):2147-53. PubMed ID: 10543014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.