These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11189929)
41. Residual motion on flexion-extension radiographs after simulated lumbar arthrodesis in human cadavers. Bono CM; Bawa M; White KK; Mahar A; Vives M; Kauffman C; Garfin SR J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jul; 21(5):364-71. PubMed ID: 18600148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Changes in the lumbar foramen following anterior interbody fusion with tapered or cylindrical cages. Wang M; Dalal S; Bagaria VB; McGrady LM; Rao RD Spine J; 2007; 7(5):563-9. PubMed ID: 17905318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The effect of posterior instrumentation following PLIF with BAK cages is most pronounced in weak bone. Pitzen T; Matthis D; Steudel WI Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2002 Feb; 144(2):121-8; discussion 128. PubMed ID: 11862511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Relaxation response of lumbar segments undergoing disc-space distraction: implications to the stability of anterior lumbar interbody implants. Havey RM; Voronov LI; Tsitsopoulos PP; Carandang G; Ghanayem AJ; Lorenz MA; Zindrick MR; Patwardhan AG Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Apr; 37(9):733-40. PubMed ID: 21912319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Direct current electrical stimulation increases the fusion rate of spinal fusion cages. Toth JM; Seim HB; Schwardt JD; Humphrey WB; Wallskog JA; Turner AS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2000 Oct; 25(20):2580-7. PubMed ID: 11034641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities. McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Finite element analysis of the effects of pedicle screw fixation nut loosening on lumbar interbody fusion based on the elasto-plateau plasticity of bone characteristics. Kim Y; Kim TW Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Mar; 35(6):599-606. PubMed ID: 20139810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Biomechanical Analysis of Porous Additive Manufactured Cages for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis. Zhang Z; Li H; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Li Y; Liu W World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():e581-e591. PubMed ID: 29288855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Initial stability of two PLIF-techniques. A biomechanical comparison using a finite element model]. Pitzen T; Matthis D; Caspar W; Müller-Storz H; Steudel WI Orthopade; 2000 Jan; 29(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 10663249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Comparison of cage designs for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical study. Cho W; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Oct; 23(8):979-85. PubMed ID: 18675496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Strength and stability of posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Comparison of titanium fiber mesh implant and tricortical bone graft. Hoshijima K; Nightingale RW; Yu JR; Richardson WJ; Harper KD; Yamamoto H; Myers BS Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jun; 22(11):1181-8. PubMed ID: 9201853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Effect of cage design, supplemental posterior instrumentation and approach on primary stability of a lumbar interbody fusion - A biomechanical in vitro study. Schmoelz W; Sandriesser S; Loebl O; Bauer M; Krappinger D Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2017 Oct; 48():30-34. PubMed ID: 28719806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The influence of cancellous bone density on load sharing in human lumbar spine: a comparison between an intact and a surgically altered motion segment. Pitzen T; Geisler FH; Matthis D; Müller-Storz H; Pedersen K; Steudel WI Eur Spine J; 2001 Feb; 10(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 11276832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]