72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11190946)
1. A statistical methodology for mammographic density detection.
Heine JJ; Velthuizen RP
Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2644-51. PubMed ID: 11190946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the statistical nature of mammograms.
Heine JJ; Deans SR; Velthuizen RP; Clarke LP
Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2254-65. PubMed ID: 10587206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation between mammographic density and volumetric fibroglandular tissue estimated on breast MR images.
Wei J; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Roubidoux MA; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Zhou C; Paquerault S; Chenevert T; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 2004 Apr; 31(4):933-42. PubMed ID: 15125012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Semiautomatic mammographic parenchymal patterns classification using multiple statistical features.
Castella C; Kinkel K; Eckstein MP; Sottas PE; Verdun FR; Bochud FO
Acad Radiol; 2007 Dec; 14(12):1486-99. PubMed ID: 18035278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breast density analysis for whole breast ultrasound images.
Chen JH; Huang CS; Chien KC; Takada E; Moon WK; Wu JH; Cho N; Wang YF; Chang RF
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):4933-43. PubMed ID: 19994502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A mammographic image analysis method to detect and measure changes in breast density.
Marias K; Behrenbruch C; Highnam R; Parbhoo S; Seifalian A; Brady M
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Dec; 52(3):276-82. PubMed ID: 15544906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How mammographic breast density affects radiologists' visual search patterns.
Al Mousa DS; Brennan PC; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Tan J; Mello-Thoms C
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1386-93. PubMed ID: 25172414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of intelligent systems based on Bayesian regularization network and neuro-fuzzy models for mass detection in mammograms: A comparative analysis.
Mahersia H; Boulehmi H; Hamrouni K
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 126():46-62. PubMed ID: 26831269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new method for quantitative analysis of mammographic density.
Glide-Hurst CK; Duric N; Littrup P
Med Phys; 2007 Nov; 34(11):4491-8. PubMed ID: 18072514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Field nonuniformity correction for quantitative analysis of digitized mammograms.
Pawluczyk O; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2001 Apr; 28(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 11339739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast tissue density quantification via digitized mammograms.
Saha PK; Udupa JK; Conant EF; Chakraborty DP; Sullivan D
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Aug; 20(8):792-803. PubMed ID: 11513030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Thickness correction of mammographic images by means of a global parameter model of the compressed breast.
Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Jul; 23(7):799-806. PubMed ID: 15250632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Steepest changes of a probability-based cost function for delineation of mammographic masses: a validation study.
Kinnard L; Lo SC; Makariou E; Osicka T; Wang P; Chouikha MF; Freedman MT
Med Phys; 2004 Oct; 31(10):2796-810. PubMed ID: 15543787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using computer-extracted image features for modeling of error-making patterns in detection of mammographic masses among radiology residents.
Zhang J; Lo JY; Kuzmiak CM; Ghate SV; Yoon SC; Mazurowski MA
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091907. PubMed ID: 25186394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analytical optimization of digital subtraction mammography with contrast medium using a commercial unit.
Rosado-Méndez I; Palma BA; Brandan ME
Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5544-57. PubMed ID: 19175112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast image pre-processing for mammographic tissue segmentation.
He W; Hogg P; Juette A; Denton ER; Zwiggelaar R
Comput Biol Med; 2015 Dec; 67():61-73. PubMed ID: 26498046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding?
Al Mousa DS; Mello-Thoms C; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Pietrzyk MW; Reed WM; Heard R; Poulos A; Tan J; Li Y; Brennan PC
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1377-85. PubMed ID: 25097013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Compression paddle tilt correction in full-field digital mammograms.
Kallenberg MG; Karssemeijer N
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):703-15. PubMed ID: 22241616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiresolution statistical analysis of high-resolution digital mammograms.
Heine JJ; Deans SR; Cullers DK; Stauduhar R; Clarke LP
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1997 Oct; 16(5):503-15. PubMed ID: 9368106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative performance of multiview stereoscopic and mammographic display modalities for breast lesion detection.
Webb LJ; Samei E; Lo JY; Baker JA; Ghate SV; Kim C; Soo MS; Walsh R
Med Phys; 2011 Apr; 38(4):1972-80. PubMed ID: 21626930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
