72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11190946)
21. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis.
Wei D; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 9198026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms.
Zhou C; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2001 Jun; 28(6):1056-69. PubMed ID: 11439475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise.
Burgess AE; Jacobson FL; Judy PF
Med Phys; 2001 Apr; 28(4):419-37. PubMed ID: 11339738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A regional registration technique for automated interval change analysis of breast lesions on mammograms.
Sanjay-Gopal S; Chan HP; Wilson T; Helvie M; Petrick N; Sahiner B
Med Phys; 1999 Dec; 26(12):2669-79. PubMed ID: 10619252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The detection of change in mammographic density.
Stone J; Gunasekara A; Martin LJ; Yaffe M; Minkin S; Boyd NF
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Jul; 12(7):625-30. PubMed ID: 12869401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms.
Pawluczyk O; Augustine BJ; Yaffe MJ; Rico D; Yang J; Mawdsley GE; Boyd NF
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 12674236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. On the noise variance of a digital mammography system.
Burgess A
Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):1987-95. PubMed ID: 15305451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Fully automated gradient based breast boundary detection for digitized X-ray mammograms.
Kus P; Karagoz I
Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22118773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. AEC for scanning digital mammography based on variation of scan velocity.
Aslund M; Cederström B; Lundqvist M; Danielsson M
Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3367-74. PubMed ID: 16370424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Calculation of the properties of digital mammograms using a computer simulation.
Hunt RA; Dance DR; Bakic PR; Maidment AD; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Alm Carlsson G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):395-8. PubMed ID: 15933144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The relationship between anatomic noise and volumetric breast density for digital mammography.
Mainprize JG; Tyson AH; Yaffe MJ
Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):4660-8. PubMed ID: 22894390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantitative assessment of breast density from digitized mammograms into Tabar's patterns.
Jamal N; Ng KH; Looi LM; McLean D; Zulfiqar A; Tan SP; Liew WF; Shantini A; Ranganathan S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5843-57. PubMed ID: 17068368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Impact of breast density on computer-aided detection (CAD) of breast cancer].
Yang KY; Liu XJ; Zhai RY
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 May; 34(5):360-3. PubMed ID: 22883457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging.
Lee NA; Rusinek H; Weinreb J; Chandra R; Toth H; Singer C; Newstead G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Feb; 168(2):501-6. PubMed ID: 9016235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluating geodesic active contours in microcalcifications segmentation on mammograms.
Duarte MA; Alvarenga AV; Azevedo CM; Calas MJ; Infantosi AF; Pereira WC
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Dec; 122(3):304-15. PubMed ID: 26363676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Gray-scale and geometric registration of full-field digital and film-screen mammograms.
Snoeren PR; Karssemeijer N
Med Image Anal; 2007 Apr; 11(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 17208511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Markov random field-based clustering applied to the segmentation of masses in digital mammograms.
Suliga M; Deklerck R; Nyssen E
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Sep; 32(6):502-12. PubMed ID: 18620842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location.
Li H; Giger ML; Huo Z; Olopade OI; Lan L; Weber BL; Bonta I
Med Phys; 2004 Mar; 31(3):549-55. PubMed ID: 15070253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Factors affecting the rate of false positive marks in CAD in full-field digital mammography.
Engelken F; Bremme R; Bick U; Hammann-Kloss S; Fallenberg EM
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e844-8. PubMed ID: 22647420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Using simple mathematical functions to simulate pathological structures--input for digital mammography clinical trial.
Ruschin M; Tingberg A; Båth M; Grahn A; Håkansson M; Hemdal B; Andersson I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):424-31. PubMed ID: 15933150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
