These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

72 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11190946)

  • 41. Fertility drug use and mammographic breast density in a mammography screening cohort of premenopausal women.
    Sprague BL; Trentham-Dietz A; Terry MB; Nichols HB; Bersch AJ; Buist DS
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Nov; 17(11):3128-33. PubMed ID: 18990754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Mammographic findings after breast augmentation with autologous fat injection.
    Carvajal J; Patiño JH
    Aesthet Surg J; 2008; 28(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 19083521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Computer-aided detection systems for breast masses: comparison of performances on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
    Wei J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Chan HP; Ge J; Roubidoux MA; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Wu YT; Paramagul C; Zhang Y
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 17502255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Spectral analysis of full field digital mammography data.
    Heine JJ; Velthuizen RP
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):647-61. PubMed ID: 12033559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Centred contact density functions for the statistical analysis of random sets. A stereological study on benign and malignant glandular tissue using image analysis.
    Mattfeldt T; Schmidt V; Reepschläger D; Rose C; Frey H
    J Microsc; 1996 Aug; 183(Pt 2):158-69. PubMed ID: 8805827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Statistical comparison of color cancer cell images.
    Demidenko E
    Oncol Rep; 2006; 15(4):1077-1079. PubMed ID: 16525704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. An interactive image processing system.
    Troxel DE
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 1981 Jan; 3(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 21868923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Breast density analysis of digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Heine J; Fowler EEE; Weinfurtner RJ; Hume E; Tworoger SS
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18760. PubMed ID: 37907569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Automated percent mammographic density, mammographic texture variation, and risk of breast cancer: a nested case-control study.
    Warner ET; Rice MS; Zeleznik OA; Fowler EE; Murthy D; Vachon CM; Bertrand KA; Rosner BA; Heine J; Tamimi RM
    NPJ Breast Cancer; 2021 May; 7(1):68. PubMed ID: 34059687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Spatial Correlation and Breast Cancer Risk.
    Fowler EEE; Hathaway C; Tillman F; Weinfurtner R; Sellers TA; Heine J
    Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2019 Jul; 5(4):. PubMed ID: 33304615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation.
    He W; Juette A; Denton ER; Oliver A; Martí R; Zwiggelaar R
    Int J Breast Cancer; 2015; 2015():276217. PubMed ID: 26171249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Automated Volumetric Breast Density derived by Shape and Appearance Modeling.
    Malkov S; Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2014 Mar; 9034():90342T. PubMed ID: 25083119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Automated Percentage of Breast Density Measurements for Full-field Digital Mammography Applications.
    Fowler EE; Vachon CM; Scott CG; Sellers TA; Heine JJ
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):958-70. PubMed ID: 25018067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Full field digital mammography and breast density: comparison of calibrated and noncalibrated measurements.
    Heine JJ; Fowler EE; Flowers CI
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Nov; 18(11):1430-6. PubMed ID: 21971260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Characterization and classification of tumor lesions using computerized fractal-based texture analysis and support vector machines in digital mammograms.
    Guo Q; Shao J; Ruiz VF
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2009 Jan; 4(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 20033598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Methodology for generating a 3D computerized breast phantom from empirical data.
    Li CM; Segars WP; Tourassi GD; Boone JM; Dobbins JT
    Med Phys; 2009 Jul; 36(7):3122-31. PubMed ID: 19673211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Quantification of breast density with dual energy mammography: a simulation study.
    Ducote JL; Molloi S
    Med Phys; 2008 Dec; 35(12):5411-8. PubMed ID: 19175100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. An automated approach for estimation of breast density.
    Heine JJ; Carston MJ; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Wu FF; Pankratz VS; Sellers TA; Vachon CM
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2008 Nov; 17(11):3090-7. PubMed ID: 18990749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit.
    Lu LJ; Nishino TK; Khamapirad T; Grady JJ; Leonard MH; Brunder DG
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4905-21. PubMed ID: 17671343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A statistical methodology for mammographic density detection.
    Heine JJ; Velthuizen RP
    Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2644-51. PubMed ID: 11190946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.