These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11190947)

  • 1. Phototimer setup for CR imaging.
    Christodoulou EG; Goodsit MM; Chan HP; Hepburn TW
    Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2652-8. PubMed ID: 11190947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
    Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
    Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
    Tingberg A; Sjöström D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Investigation of optimum X-ray beam tube voltage and filtration for chest radiography with a computed radiography system.
    Moore CS; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):771-7. PubMed ID: 18662964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-ratio grid considerations in mobile chest radiography.
    Scott AW; Gauntt DM; Yester MV; Barnes GT
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3142-53. PubMed ID: 22755699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Image quality and dose comparison among screen-film, computed, and CT scanned projection radiography: applications to CT urography.
    McCollough CH; Bruesewitz MR; Vrtiska TJ; King BF; LeRoy AJ; Quam JP; Hattery RR
    Radiology; 2001 Nov; 221(2):395-403. PubMed ID: 11687682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image quality evaluation of a desktop computed radiography system.
    Fetterly KA; Hangiandreou NJ
    Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2669-79. PubMed ID: 11190949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of an amorphous silicon/cesium iodide flat-panel digital chest radiography system with screen/film and computed radiography systems--a contrast-detail phantom study.
    Rong XJ; Shaw CC; Liu X; Lemacks MR; Thompson SK
    Med Phys; 2001 Nov; 28(11):2328-35. PubMed ID: 11764040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
    Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Calibrating automatic exposure control devices for digital radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(21):5475-85. PubMed ID: 17047264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Schemes for the optimization of chest radiography using a computer model of the patient and x-ray imaging system.
    Sandborg M; McVey G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 11695764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of image quality among three X-ray systems for chest radiography: first step in optimisation.
    Nocetti D; Ubeda C; Calcagno S; Acevedo J; Pardo D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):386-91. PubMed ID: 25821212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of reduced exposure on computed radiography: comparison of nodule detection accuracy with conventional and asymmetric screen-film radiographs of a chest phantom.
    Kimme-Smith C; Aberle DR; Sayre JW; Hart EM; Greaves SM; Brown K; Young DA; Deseran MD; Johnson T; Johnson SL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Aug; 165(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 7618538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of beam tube potential variation on gonad dose to patients during chest radiography investigated using high sensitivity LiF:Mg,Cu,P thermoluminescent dosemeters.
    Fung KK; Gilboy WB
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):358-67. PubMed ID: 11387155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of optimum energies for chest imaging using film-screen and computed radiography.
    Honey ID; Mackenzie A; Evans DS
    Br J Radiol; 2005 May; 78(929):422-7. PubMed ID: 15845936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
    Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterization of the phase-contrast radiography edge-enhancement effect in a cabinet x-ray system.
    Donnelly EF; Lewis KG; Wolske KM; Pickens DR; Price RR
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jan; 51(1):21-30. PubMed ID: 16357428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Signal, noise power spectrum, and detective quantum efficiency of indirect-detection flat-panel imagers for diagnostic radiology.
    Siewerdsen JH; Antonuk LE; el-Mohri Y; Yorkston J; Huang W; Cunningham IA
    Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):614-28. PubMed ID: 9608470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.