These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11190947)

  • 21. Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors.
    Mackenzie A; Honey ID
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3345-57. PubMed ID: 17879798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
    Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimization of image acquisition techniques for dual-energy imaging of the chest.
    Shkumat NA; Siewerdsen JH; Dhanantwari AC; Williams DB; Richard S; Paul NS; Yorkston J; Van Metter R
    Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3904-15. PubMed ID: 17985636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimization of chest radiographic imaging parameters: a comparison of image quality and entrance skin dose for digital chest radiography systems.
    Sun Z; Lin C; Tyan Y; Ng KH
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 22726965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Investigating the exposure class of a computed radiography system for optimisation of physical image quality for chest radiography.
    Moore CS; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
    Br J Radiol; 2009 Aug; 82(981):705-10. PubMed ID: 19221185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
    Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Correlation of image quality with exposure index and processing protocol in a computed radiography system.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Blastaris GA; Moutsatsos AS; Chios PS; Efstathopoulos EP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(2):162-71. PubMed ID: 18245792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Understanding the relative sensitivity of radiographic screens to scattered radiation.
    Yip KL; Whiting BR; Kocher TE; Trauernicht DP; Van Metter RL
    Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1727-37. PubMed ID: 8946369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Digital slot-scan charge-coupled device radiography versus AMBER and Bucky screen-film radiography: comparison of image quality in a phantom study.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Mertens BJ; Geleijns J
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):857-66. PubMed ID: 15845787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
    Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimization of standard patient radiographic images for chest, skull and pelvis exams in conventional x-ray equipment.
    Pina DR; Duarte SB; Ghilardi Netto T; Trad CS; Brochi MA; de Oliveira SC
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 49(14):N215-26. PubMed ID: 15357201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Image quality of thickened slabs in multislice CT chest examinations: postprocessing vs. direct reconstruction].
    Wedegärtner U; Yamamura J; Nagel HD; Aldefeld D; Brinkmann C; Popovych S; Buchert R; Weber C; Adam G
    Rofo; 2007 Apr; 179(4):373-9. PubMed ID: 17385132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Pixelwise fusion for optimizing SNR in multiple-plate computed radiography imaging.
    Wang T; Shaw CC; Li CC
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Mar; 18(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 10363702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optical image processing with liquid-crystal display for image intensifier/television systems.
    Lam KL; Chan HP; Doi K
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(6):838-45. PubMed ID: 3237140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of imaging properties of a computed radiography system and screen-film systems.
    Sanada S; Doi K; Xu XW; Yin FF; Giger ML; MacMahon H
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(3):414-20. PubMed ID: 1870484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. AEC set-up optimisation with computed radiography imaging.
    Mazzocchi S; Belli G; Busoni S; Gori C; Menchi I; Salucci P; Taddeucci A; Zatelli G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):169-73. PubMed ID: 16461503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Variable compensation chest radiography performed with a computed radiography system: design considerations and initial clinical experience.
    Dobbins JT; Rice JJ; Goodman PC; Patz EF; Ravin CE
    Radiology; 1993 Apr; 187(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 8451437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Empirical investigation of the signal performance of a high-resolution, indirect detection, active matrix flat-panel imager (AMFPI) for fluoroscopic and radiographic operation.
    Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Siewerdsen JH; Yorkston J; Huang W; Scarpine VE; Street RA
    Med Phys; 1997 Jan; 24(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 9029541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Portable chest imaging: comparison of storage phosphor digital, asymmetric screen-film, and conventional screen-film systems.
    Niklason LT; Chan HP; Cascade PN; Chang CL; Chee PW; Mathews JF
    Radiology; 1993 Feb; 186(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 8421740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. An experimental comparison of detector performance for computed radiography systems.
    Samei E; Flynn MJ
    Med Phys; 2002 Apr; 29(4):447-59. PubMed ID: 11991117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.