These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11191260)

  • 1. Measurement error correction using validation data: a review of methods and their applicability in case-control studies.
    Thürigen D; Spiegelman D; Blettner M; Heuer C; Brenner H
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2000 Oct; 9(5):447-74. PubMed ID: 11191260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accounting for response misclassification and covariate measurement error improves power and reduces bias in epidemiologic studies.
    Cheng D; Branscum AJ; Stamey JD
    Ann Epidemiol; 2010 Jul; 20(7):562-7. PubMed ID: 20538200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. All your data are always missing: incorporating bias due to measurement error into the potential outcomes framework.
    Edwards JK; Cole SR; Westreich D
    Int J Epidemiol; 2015 Aug; 44(4):1452-9. PubMed ID: 25921223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple-imputation for measurement-error correction.
    Cole SR; Chu H; Greenland S
    Int J Epidemiol; 2006 Aug; 35(4):1074-81. PubMed ID: 16709616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Study design for epidemiologic studies with measurement error.
    Holford TR; Stack C
    Stat Methods Med Res; 1995 Dec; 4(4):339-58. PubMed ID: 8745130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Correction of risk estimates for measurement error in epidemiology.
    Bashir SA; Duffy SW
    Methods Inf Med; 1995 Dec; 34(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 8713766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Performance of bias-correction methods for exposure measurement error using repeated measurements with and without missing data.
    Batistatou E; McNamee R
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(28):3467-80. PubMed ID: 22733598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation studies in epidemiology: the relative precision of different designs.
    Wong M; Day NE
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 2000; 5(6):331-7. PubMed ID: 11234737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust techniques for measurement error correction: a review.
    Guolo A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):555-80. PubMed ID: 18375458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.
    Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Statistical methods for epidemiologic studies of the health effects of air pollution.
    Navidi W; Thomas D; Langholz B; Stram D
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 1999 May; (86):1-50; discussion 51-6. PubMed ID: 10465799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The performance of methods for correcting measurement error in case-control studies.
    Stürmer T; Thürigen D; Spiegelman D; Blettner M; Brenner H
    Epidemiology; 2002 Sep; 13(5):507-16. PubMed ID: 12192219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The case-time-control design: further assumptions and conditions.
    Suissa S
    Epidemiology; 1998 Jul; 9(4):441-5. PubMed ID: 9647910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Understanding research: 1. Methodologies used to answer research questions.
    Baxter H
    J Wound Care; 2001 Jul; 10(7):269-72. PubMed ID: 12964346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of regression calibration and SIMEX methods in logistic regression when one of the predictors is subject to additive measurement error.
    Fung KY; Krewski D
    J Epidemiol Biostat; 1999; 4(2):65-74. PubMed ID: 10619053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlated errors in biased surrogates: study designs and methods for measurement error correction.
    Spiegelman D; Zhao B; Kim J
    Stat Med; 2005 Jun; 24(11):1657-82. PubMed ID: 15736283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The investigation and correction of recall bias for an ordinal response in a case-control study.
    Barry D; Livingstone V
    Stat Med; 2006 Mar; 25(6):965-75. PubMed ID: 15977299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods for analyzing data from probabilistic linkage strategies based on partially identifying variables.
    Hof MH; Zwinderman AH
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4231-42. PubMed ID: 22807060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations.
    Fan C; Zhang D; Zhang CH
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1172-87. PubMed ID: 23957522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dual responses to increase validity in case-control studies.
    Salmi LR; Wacholder S
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1990; 38(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 2181566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.